Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Koni\s+rear\s+mount\s+design\s+vs\s+Cape\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Koni\s+rear\s+mount\s+design\s+vs\s+Cape\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Healeys] Koni rear mount design vs Cape (score: 1): Author: "Steve B. Gerow" <steveg@abrazosdata.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:57:29 -0800; I've had the Cape rear kit installed for several years and even though the bottom mounts were bent by the inclusion of too-short shocks, the top mount IMHO is a good design and shows no distortion wh; /html/healeys/2010-02/msg00439.html (7,261 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] Koni rear mount design vs Cape (score: 1): Author: Peter Caldwell <peter@nosimport.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:14:25 -0600; Steve, your pictures are very good thanks. For Everyone's information, I have scanned the original instructions for the Koni kit and can send as .PDF. _______________________________________________; /html/healeys/2010-02/msg00475.html (7,338 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] Koni rear mount design vs Cape (score: 1): Author: "Al Fuller" <al@bighealey.org>; Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:45:21 -0500; Steve: you indicate below that if you had it to do over again, you would go with the Putzke shock conversion over the Cape kit. Can you tell us what your thinking is on that score? Al Fuller al@bighe; /html/healeys/2010-03/msg00009.html (7,845 bytes)
4. Re: [Healeys] Koni rear mount design vs Cape (score: 1): Author: Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:25:02 +0800; Putzke's rear kit requires no modifications and uses the existing shock mounts. Cape kit you have to drill up and reinforce the rear seat shelf. Alan -- Sent from my mobile device Alan '52 A90 '53 B; /html/healeys/2010-03/msg00017.html (9,102 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]