Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+SHELLEY\s+LJ\-31\s+Jack\s+not\s+correct\s+for\s+BN2\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+SHELLEY\s+LJ\-31\s+Jack\s+not\s+correct\s+for\s+BN2\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] SHELLEY LJ-31 Jack not correct for BN2. (score: 1): Author: Wwycoffbn7@aol.com; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:00:29 EST; The LJ31 is not proper for BN1s or BN2s. Some early BN2s would use a King Dick B1077 up to C.229080. Most BN2s would have been equipped with an LJ21. In the July, 1991 issue of Austin Healey Magazin; /html/healeys/2008-01/msg00161.html (7,533 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] SHELLEY LJ-31 Jack not correct for BN2. (score: 1): Author: "Richard Bittmann" <edmyed@harbornet.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:19:14 -0800; MkII BJ7 for one _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Healeys@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys http://www.team; /html/healeys/2008-01/msg00164.html (8,547 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] SHELLEY LJ-31 Jack not correct for BN2. (score: 1): Author: Tadeusz Malkiewicz <tadeusz.malkiewicz@plusnet.pl>; Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:54:11 +0100; Thanks for all help!.. I am still looking then. Or maybe I should stay a bit cool and wait for the Healey to arrive first ;-) Best Regards, Tadek Tadek, The LJ31 is not proper for BN1s or BN2s. Some; /html/healeys/2008-01/msg00175.html (8,015 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]