Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Tube\s+Shock\s+Conversion\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] Tube Shock Conversion (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Goodman" <mkgoodman@att.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:48:45 -0400
To those who are thinking of replacing your shocks. I highly recommend trying Udo's Billstein Conversion Kit. I have had the original shocks in the car since I purchased it from the original owner in
/html/healeys/2008-10/msg00452.html (7,606 bytes)

2. Re: [Healeys] Tube Shock Conversion (score: 1)
Author: "Ed's Shop" <shop@justbrits.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:15:02 -0600
And if you had had the stock units re-built by Peter @ World Wide you would have BEST handling available AND had LOTS of DOLLARS still in your pocket, Mark<G>!! ______________________________________
/html/healeys/2008-10/msg00453.html (6,577 bytes)

3. Re: [Healeys] Tube Shock Conversion (score: 1)
Author: GSFuqua1@aol.com
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:55:58 EDT
No argument about having more dollars but I certainly like Udo's kit myself and here in the Ozarks we have some great roads for "Spirited" driving. Gary **Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All
/html/healeys/2008-10/msg00454.html (7,398 bytes)

4. Re: [Healeys] Tube Shock Conversion (score: 1)
Author: "Craig and Sue Rice" <craigsuerice@iquest.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:44:59 -0600
Ed is absolutely correct! Armstrong Shocks can wear out and not show large amounts of leakage. World Wide rebuilts are outstanding. My BN1 doesn't jump across the road. Craig Rice (Indiana) BN1 & BN2
/html/healeys/2008-10/msg00458.html (8,717 bytes)

5. Re: [Healeys] Tube Shock Conversion (score: 1)
Author: Randy Hicks <Healey100M@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:13:04 -0400
Craig, you are both right and wrong. Keep in mind that Mark was referring to a BJ8, not a 100. Peter @ World Wide did my original shocks for both my 100M and BJ8. After buying a '60 BN7 that had the
/html/healeys/2008-10/msg00459.html (10,217 bytes)

6. Re: [Healeys] Tube Shock Conversion (score: 1)
Author: "Freese, Ken" <Kendall.Freese@Aerojet.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:18:19 -0700
I learned something about the shocks on a Healey during Martin Jansen's Jule frame tech session at the Conclave. The Armstrong 50/50 rate and the is logically going to be harder on the frame than the
/html/healeys/2008-10/msg00460.html (7,894 bytes)

7. Re: [Healeys] Tube Shock Conversion (score: 1)
Author: Peter Caldwell <peter@nosimport.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:28:40 -0500
Ken, with all due respect, who claims Armstrong valving is 50/50? _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Healeys@autox.team.net http://autox.
/html/healeys/2008-10/msg00461.html (7,878 bytes)

8. Re: [Healeys] Tube Shock Conversion (score: 1)
Author: "Donald Paye" <dpaye@crocker.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:43:35 -0400
I would like to say I am completely satisfied with World Wide's products but I am about to send back my right rear shock for hopefully another no charge exchange in one year. They were fine with me l
/html/healeys/2008-10/msg00462.html (8,785 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu