Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+WG\:\s+rear\s+shocks\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] WG: rear shocks (score: 1)
Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:13:46 +0100
I just saw on the World Wide Auto Parts wep page the change in fitting of the front shocks from No RM6075 to No RM8002 was inn 1961/62. So my question: Which is the right shock for a 1962 BT7 Tricarb
/html/healeys/2010-12/msg00338.html (7,398 bytes)

2. Re: [Healeys] WG: rear shocks (score: 1)
Author: Bob Haskell <rchaskell@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 05:10:27 -0500
Their catalog (http://nosimport.com/shoxcatalog.htm) shows RM6075 for the roadsters and RM8002 for the convertibles. Based on the factory parts list, I don't think that's correct: AKD 8555 (3rd edit
/html/healeys/2010-12/msg00339.html (10,004 bytes)

3. Re: [Healeys] WG: rear shocks (score: 1)
Author: <Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:32:39 +0100
Many thanks, that`s very helpful. World Wide Auto Parts catalog says RM6075 up to the year 1961. That may mean not to the end of BT7/BN7 Production. Their catalog also says RM8002 starts with BJ7, w
/html/healeys/2010-12/msg00340.html (9,077 bytes)

4. Re: [Healeys] WG: rear shocks (score: 1)
Author: Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:43:09 +0800
The spring rates on the roadsters vs. the convertibles are different (because the convertibles are heavier); therefore I believe the damping rates of the shocks are different. _______________________
/html/healeys/2010-12/msg00341.html (7,448 bytes)

5. Re: [Healeys] WG: rear shocks (score: 1)
Author: Bob Haskell <rchaskell@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:02:57 -0500
I don't know what the difference is. Peter Caldwell of World Wide Auto Parts of Madison is on this mailing list. Hopefully, he'll have a free moment and give us an explanation. Cheers, Bob Haskell 3
/html/healeys/2010-12/msg00343.html (9,994 bytes)

6. Re: [Healeys] WG: rear shocks (score: 1)
Author: Peter Caldwell <peter@nosimport.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:54:42 -0600
Sorry, I was off list for a bit. The shock 6075 and 8002 are externally identical. The number we use is the Armstrong number stamped on the underside of each shock casting on the fronts. (on the rea
/html/healeys/2010-12/msg00347.html (8,540 bytes)

7. Re: [Healeys] WG: rear shocks (score: 1)
Author: "John Sims" <ahbn6@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:09:23 -0500
I will host it. John Sims, BN6 Aberdeen, NJ http://www.healey6.com --Original Message-- From: healeys-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:healeys-bounces@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Peter Caldwell Sent:
/html/healeys/2010-12/msg00348.html (9,554 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu