Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+rear\s+end\s+ratio\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+rear\s+end\s+ratio\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] rear end ratio question (score: 1): Author: "Brits'n'Pieces $Eric Frenken$" <lists@brits-n-pieces.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:36:47 +0100; While rebuilding my engine (3000 cc) I'll have it modified to an expected output of about 150-170 bhp. What kind of rear end ratio do you suggest? As it is an early centre shift gearbox with O/D, the; /html/healeys/2008-12/msg00558.html (7,308 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] rear end ratio question (score: 1): Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:11:56 -0800; I have a 3.5 rearend in my BJ8, which has a stock engine and 22% O/D. Starting from stopped requires a little more finessing of the clutch to prevent judder, first and second gears are more usable f; /html/healeys/2008-12/msg00560.html (8,148 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] rear end ratio question (score: 1): Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:36:56 -0800; I should add if you've increased the HP at the expense of low- and mid-range torque the taller rearend may not be as desirable. The racers on the List can probably address this issue. Bob -- ** Bob S; /html/healeys/2008-12/msg00562.html (8,063 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]