Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+stolen\s+car\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+stolen\s+car\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] stolen car (score: 1): Author: Richard Kahn <tahoehealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 13:35:11 -0700; The owner was paid market value by the insurance company in 1993 so no need to NOT tell the new owner. I think the insurance company may have issues, that and getting clear title in the states. I thi; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00373.html (7,023 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] stolen car (score: 1): Author: Richard Ewald <richard.ewald@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 14:48:28 -0700; So how do you know the car was insured? Whether it was insured or not, the only legal title belongs to either the guy who it got stolen from, or if it was insured, his insurance company. No one can h; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00382.html (8,771 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] stolen car (score: 1): Author: "BJ8 Healeys" <sbyers@ec.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 17:50:03 -0400; Rich, the car in question is not in the USA. It was in a foreign country when stolen, and is still in a foreign country. The owner in 1993 may or may not have received a satisfactory settlement from; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00383.html (9,255 bytes)
4. Re: [Healeys] stolen car (score: 1): Author: "Mike Slechta" <mslechta@chartermi.net>; Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 17:07:29 -0500; True, the victim did get paid, but I think the insurance company would have an issue & I believe they would win. Mad Mike -- Original Message -- From: Richard Kahn To: healeys@autox.team.net Sent: Fr; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00385.html (8,579 bytes)
5. Re: [Healeys] stolen car (score: 1): Author: Richard Kahn <tahoehealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 18:55:00 -0700; If the car is returned and it was insured, he would have to repay the insurance company. So how do you know the car was insured?Whether it was insured or not, the only legal title belongs to either t; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00395.html (9,158 bytes)
6. Re: [Healeys] stolen car (score: 1): Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>; Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 09:10:52 +0200; However the insurance company could have sold on the vehicle when the car was found back after some time time. Making the consequent owners perfectly legal?. Kees Oudesluijs NL ______________________; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00400.html (10,227 bytes)
7. Re: [Healeys] stolen car (score: 1): Author: Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 16:25:37 +0800; For something like this there usually is a statute of limitation. Given that it was stolen in 1993, my view is that the current owner would be probably be viewed as the legitimate owner in the eyes o; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00402.html (11,379 bytes)
8. Re: [Healeys] stolen car (score: 1): Author: Marvin James <britcrs@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 16:05:32 -0700; I have a friend that bought a Porsche 912 off a used car lot in San Diego in about 1972. He moved to Arizona in '93 and had no trouble registering it there. He sold it to a friend in Texas who resold; /html/healeys/2010-05/msg00412.html (8,433 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]