Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Land\-speed\]\s+Chassis\s+Dyno\s+Operations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Land\-speed\]\s+Chassis\s+Dyno\s+Operations\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Land-speed] Chassis Dyno Operations (score: 1): Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:46:00 -0700; More fun dumb questions from me. Why do we use high gear during a chassis dyno pull? The dyno does not know what gear the car is in, does it? Is there a general limit on the acceleration rate of the; /html/land-speed/2010-06/msg00027.html (7,475 bytes)
2. Re: [Land-speed] Chassis Dyno Operations (score: 1): Author: Rich Fox <v4gmr@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:36:21 -0700 (PDT); I would guess that a 1:1 direct gear more closely approximates the direct connection of an engine dyno. Also makes it easier to stay hooked up to the rollers? Just guessing. More fun dumb questions f; /html/land-speed/2010-06/msg00028.html (7,978 bytes)
3. [Land-speed] Chassis Dyno Operations (score: 1): Author: "John Burk" <joyseydevil@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:07:05 -0400; I'd guess less wheel slip and smaller , less expensive energy absorption / conversion unit . _______________________________________________ Land-speed@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/dona; /html/land-speed/2010-06/msg00029.html (7,810 bytes)
4. [Land-speed] Chassis Dyno Operations (score: 1): Author: "Kirkwood" <saltfever@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:31:35 -0700; So many questions before you had your coffee! LOL Many years ago, on an early Go Power dyno, it would not hold the load due to torque multiplication at lower RPM and would cavitate. We had to use dir; /html/land-speed/2010-06/msg00030.html (8,117 bytes)
5. Re: [Land-speed] Chassis Dyno Operations (score: 1): Author: FFR554@aol.com; Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 01:04:20 EDT; My experience is that the normal loss between an engine Dyno pull and a chassis dyno pull is 5 - 10% using a standard transmission and non-quickchange rear end in high gear . The loss increases in lo; /html/land-speed/2010-06/msg00031.html (9,565 bytes)
6. Re: [Land-speed] Chassis Dyno Operations (score: 1): Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 22:08:09 -0700; Well, this wasn't an exercise to try and find out why a dyno I have didn't work (I don't have one). I was asking why we do testing the way it is done. What is the rationale for doing it that way? You; /html/land-speed/2010-06/msg00032.html (9,739 bytes)
7. [Land-speed] Chassis Dyno Operations (score: 1): Author: "Kirkwood" <saltfever@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 22:36:29 -0700; The only chassis dyno pull I have witnessed in the last 10 years was a roadster with a C-10 automatic. That run was done in 2nd gear not high gear. When I asked why 2nd gear the operator said the sam; /html/land-speed/2010-06/msg00033.html (8,319 bytes)
8. Re: [Land-speed] Chassis Dyno Operations (score: 1): Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:20:00 -0700; _______________________________________________ Land-speed@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://www.team.net/forums; /html/land-speed/2010-06/msg00035.html (8,428 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]