- 1. [Land-speed] Racing but not LSR (score: 1)
- Author: DougOdom <dlodom@charter.net>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:38:35 -0700
- Check out this raceway idea. Looks like its going to be next to the old Castle Air Force base if it does get built. Yesterday was the first I had heard of it. Interesting concept. Doug Odom in big di
- /html/land-speed/2008-03/msg00157.html (6,324 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Land-speed] Racing but not LSR (score: 1)
- Author: dan warner <dwarner230@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 06:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
- This is as interesting as the P51 video you sent a couple of weeks ago. DW You are subscribed as dwarner230@yahoo.com http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed -- You rock. That's why Blockb
- /html/land-speed/2008-04/msg00000.html (7,028 bytes)
- 3. [Land-speed] Racing but not LSR (score: 1)
- Author: DougOdom <dlodom@charter.net>
- Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:16:03 -0700
- Check out this raceway idea. Looks like its going to be next to the old Castle Air Force base if it does get built. Yesterday was the first I had heard of it. Interesting concept. Doug Odom in big di
- /html/land-speed/2008-04/msg00001.html (6,562 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Land-speed] Racing but not LSR (score: 1)
- Author: BWANA343@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 13:53:20 EDT
- If you check out an aerial shot from Google, the original Castle AFB runway totals over 14000 ft, seems a shame it can't also be utilized for LSR. It's also 300 ft wide. A lot of cars could run two m
- /html/land-speed/2008-04/msg00003.html (7,453 bytes)
- 5. [Land-speed] Racing but not LSR (score: 1)
- Author: "Elon" <saltfever@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 22:10:32 -0700
- The ACTIVE runway is 11,802 but if you include the displaced threshold at each end it is close to your 14k number. I have landed there a few times and the south 1,000 ft threshold and runway would be
- /html/land-speed/2008-04/msg00010.html (7,915 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu