Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Land\-speed\]\s+Rear\s+end\s+efficiency\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Land\-speed\]\s+Rear\s+end\s+efficiency\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Land-speed] Rear end efficiency (score: 1): Author: DougOdom <dlodom@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:50:42 -0800; I asked this question on landspeed.com and never got an answer. Can anyone tell me when and where there has been testing done on the efficiency of the different styles of rear end gears. Quick change; /html/land-speed/2008-01/msg00297.html (7,299 bytes)
2. Re: [Land-speed] Rear end efficiency (score: 1): Author: "don thigpen" <piggy@accessatc.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:05:18 -0500; the older i get , the less efficient my rear end is ! don t evo power & machine www.accessatc.net/~piggy www.snartracing.com SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKIES..... THEY ARE NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING..; /html/land-speed/2008-01/msg00298.html (7,156 bytes)
3. Re: [Land-speed] Rear end efficiency (score: 1): Author: JERRY FOSTER <fosterap@flash.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:03:09 -0800 (PST); Hi Doug.........somebody has produced a quick change that is supposed to be great for LSR. Sparky knows about this. Perhaps he will fill us in. Hope all is well out in the Big Ditch. Jerry in Dallas; /html/land-speed/2008-01/msg00299.html (7,444 bytes)
4. Re: [Land-speed] Rear end efficiency (score: 1): Author: "John Burk" <joyseydevil@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:26:27 -0500; Last July Tony Prerra posted that he had done a chassis dyno comparison between a QC , 9" & a 12 bolt dropout . He found the CG was the worst , the 9" was 6 hp better & the dropout was a total of 10; /html/land-speed/2008-01/msg00300.html (7,896 bytes)
5. Re: [Land-speed] Rear end efficiency (score: 1): Author: John Staiger <lsrvette@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:58:05 -0800 (PST); I talked to Winters, Tiger and Frankland about your very question this past December at the PRI show. As I'm in the market for a QC I had similar interests/concerns. Discounting Frankland (no help w; /html/land-speed/2008-01/msg00301.html (10,249 bytes)
6. Re: [Land-speed] Rear end efficiency (score: 1): Author: John Thornton <jthorn65@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:05:26 -0600; The difference inefficiency is because of the difference in the strength. The 9" has greater strength because it has a larger area of engagement between the ring gear and the pinion because the pinio; /html/land-speed/2008-01/msg00304.html (8,433 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]