Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Mgs\]\s+ZDDP\s+again\s+\/\s+STP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Mgs\]\s+ZDDP\s+again\s+\/\s+STP\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Mgs] ZDDP again / STP (score: 1): Author: "Bob Donahue" <bobmgtd@insightbb.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 00:28:10 -0400; Works for me. Does anyone have a reason not to use STP in an MG? Bob Donahue (Still Stuck in the '50s) Email - bobmgtd@insightbb.com Cars: 52 MGTD - #17639 71 MGB - #GHN5UB254361 Member: NEMGTR #1147; /html/mgs/2007-09/msg00005.html (8,088 bytes)
2. Re: [Mgs] ZDDP again / STP (score: 1): Author: Brian Boss <bwboss@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 14:10:55 -0700 (PDT); This isn't a reason not to use STP, per se, but I think GM's EOS is a better product for raising ZDDP levels. It was designed and marketed as a break in additive but a lot of car enthusiasts use it a; /html/mgs/2007-09/msg00011.html (9,702 bytes)
3. Re: [Mgs] ZDDP again / STP (score: 1): Author: Rick Lindsay <rolindsay@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 16:39:05 -0700 (PDT); ...and I add: Everyone and his brother has harsh opinions regarding oil additives. Here are mine: + No additive makes oil lubricate better - including the additives that make multi-viscosity oils! +; /html/mgs/2007-09/msg00013.html (8,312 bytes)
4. Re: [Mgs] ZDDP again / STP (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 09:24:47 +0100; Amen to that. Many years ago in the UK the various Holts additives were advertised as doing just that - getting round a problem that would otherwise require an expensive replacement or repair, with v; /html/mgs/2007-09/msg00015.html (8,062 bytes)
5. Re: [Mgs] ZDDP again / STP (score: 1): Author: "Larry Daniels" <ladaniels@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 07:22:49 -0500; This isn't a reason not to use STP, per se, but I think GM's EOS is a better product for raising ZDDP levels. It was designed and marketed as a break in additive but a lot of car enthusiasts use it a; /html/mgs/2007-09/msg00016.html (8,308 bytes)
6. Re: [Mgs] ZDDP again / STP (score: 1): Author: "Larry Daniels" <ladaniels@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:44:31 -0500; This isn't a reason not to use STP, per se, but I think GM's EOS is a better product for raising ZDDP levels. It was designed and marketed as a break in additive but a lot of car enthusiasts use it a; /html/mgs/2007-09/msg00018.html (8,251 bytes)
7. Re: [Mgs] ZDDP again / STP (score: 1): Author: Brian Boss <bwboss@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:22:46 -0700 (PDT); My thinking is that there is nothing wrong with any decent oil except the reduced zinc level. The EOS product has around 50% more zinc so you can use less of it to get to the desired level. Also, STP; /html/mgs/2007-09/msg00020.html (8,922 bytes)
8. Re: [Mgs] ZDDP again / STP (score: 1): Author: "Larry Daniels" <ladaniels@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:47:52 -0500; My thinking is that there is nothing wrong with any decent oil except the reduced zinc level. The EOS product has around 50% more zinc so you can use less of it to get to the desired level. Also, STP; /html/mgs/2007-09/msg00021.html (8,828 bytes)
9. Re: [Mgs] ZDDP again / STP (score: 1): Author: Brian Boss <bwboss@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:59:55 -0700 (PDT); Charles Navarro tested some additives in addition to oils the results are near the bottom of the page at the URL in my original message. Quoting from his site: Name Vis P (ppm) Zn (ppm) B (ppm) Deter; /html/mgs/2007-09/msg00023.html (9,443 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]