Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[NC\]\s+re\:\s+Junk\s+Mail\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[NC\]\s+re\:\s+Junk\s+Mail\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [NC] re: Junk Mail (score: 1): Author: Carol <car@texas.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 13:17:39 -0500; Thanks to everybody who replied to my query regarding the junk mail issue. The most logical explanation seems to be that my name got snagged my mailers from a "use group." I had posted a couple of me; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00937.html (7,000 bytes)
2. Re: [NC] re: Junk Mail (score: 1): Author: Carol <car@texas.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 11:17:10 -0500; Sorry, List Members... The post to Roland was supposed to be private... Oh Carol logical and analytical by profession and by nature....; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01005.html (6,651 bytes)
3. Re: [NC] re: Junk Mail (score: 1): Author: Carol <car@texas.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 11:15:05 -0500; After all the private mail I received, and being somewhat logical and analytical by profession and by nature, this is the scenario I came up with. I only offered an opinion based on my observations.; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01006.html (7,383 bytes)
4. Re: [NC] re: Junk Mail (score: 1): Author: Jay Quinn <jpquinn@cyberramp.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 13:26:07 -0500; They wouldn't keep doing it and in increasing numbers if there wasn't the occational byte from the sucker that those emails are intended, which makes the profit and spamming worth while. Sad. Yes, it; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg01012.html (7,899 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]