Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Re\:\s+Overdrives\s+and\s+rpm\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Re\:\s+Overdrives\s+and\s+rpm\]\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Re: Overdrives and rpm] (score: 1): Author: Jan Eyerman <jan.eyerman@usa.net>; Date: 27 Jun 2001 20:48:17 EDT; I am not sure if those numbers are right, I have calculated 3500 RPM for a '59 Minx with a 4.55:1 rear with 5.60x15 tires. Even with smaller wheels, I would assume an Alpine with a 4.22:1 rear would; /html/alpines/2001-06/msg00262.html (7,749 bytes)
2. RE: [Re: Overdrives and rpm] (score: 1): Author: "Bill Blue" <dablue@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:49:36 -0500; I got my numbers by going to the Coker tire site and looking up the "original" tire size. The 600R 13 (MIchelin) came up, along with the factory spec outside diameter. I then went to the Cooper Tire; /html/alpines/2001-06/msg00263.html (8,839 bytes)
3. RE: [Re: Overdrives and rpm] (score: 1): Author: "Paul and Susan Almjeld" <palmjeld@home.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:01:57 -0500; Hi all: there is a very good software program called SpeedCalc which allows one to input tire circumference, rpm, and rear end ratio to determine mph. One can also input mph along with tire circumfer; /html/alpines/2001-06/msg00264.html (9,791 bytes)
4. Re: [Re: Overdrives and rpm] (score: 1): Author: "J Arzt" <humber_snipe@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:55:21 -0500; Don't forget the value of pi in the equation, Jan - there's a pretty significant difference in the circumference of the two tire sizes. The diameter of a 560x15 measures out at about 25.90", and the; /html/alpines/2001-06/msg00266.html (9,602 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]