Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Roadsters\]\s+1600\s+v\s+2000\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Roadsters\]\s+1600\s+v\s+2000\?\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: "Gregory S. Morrison" <gsm@gregorysmorrison.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:18:51 -0700; I've seen several ground up restorations of 1600s and 2000s. All things being equal, the cost is very similar. So, other than "because it's been in my family for years", or "because I like 1600s bett; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00286.html (7,511 bytes)
2. Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: "James Fogg" <James@jdfogg.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:22:31 -0500; been are not go I greatly prefer the pre-1968 models, and I'm not alone in that. If I want a 2000 I have a 6 month period in which they were made, and parts are incredibly rare for certain items (fi; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00287.html (7,903 bytes)
3. Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: Keith0alan@aol.com; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:30:00 EDT; I've seen several ground up restorations of 1600s and 2000s. All things being equal, the cost is very similar. So, other than "because it's been in my family for years", or "because I like 1600s bett; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00288.html (8,286 bytes)
4. Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: "Matt Jacquet" <matt@vander-bend.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:57:30 -0700; OMG you're are so right!! I didn't realize it till this fantastic posting.. 1600? what was I thinking? Further more what about those hideous 1500, who in there right mind would be caught dead, backin; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00289.html (8,106 bytes)
5. Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: BARTERDUDE@aol.com; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:25:04 EDT; Hey kiddies - apparently you are a novice when it comes to the entire series of roadsters. My best example is a gymkhana back in 1972, when I ran my dad's '70 240 Z in E production, my friend's '68 2; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00294.html (11,312 bytes)
6. Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: ppeters914@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:31:17 +0000; Pete "Flat Dashes Forever" ________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Datsun-roadsters mailing list http://www.team.net/archive http://autox.team.net/m; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00296.html (9,640 bytes)
7. Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: ppeters914@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:33:54 +0000; We know you're kidding, Matt. At least regarding the silver cars. <g> ________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Datsun-roadsters mailing list http://w; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00297.html (10,546 bytes)
8. Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Stoll" <dgstoll@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:30:05 -0400; 1. because my 1600 has slim chance of a death rattle coming from the timing 2. once the tires start squealing in a corner the engine size doesn't matter.... daveS -- Original Message -- From: "Gregor; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00301.html (8,709 bytes)
9. Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: geegc@aol.com; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:33:56 -0400; And I think we will be able to get parts for the 1600 engine long after 2000 parts are a fond memory (coming from someone who owns one of each) Gary C? red 1600, black 2000 __________________________; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00302.html (7,971 bytes)
10. Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: Gary McCormick <gkmcc@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:24:33 -0700; One word - hell, one LETTER... - Z Gary McCormick San Jose, CA ________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Datsun-roadsters mailing list http://www.team.; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00304.html (8,045 bytes)
11. Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: "Oliver" <sumton@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:29:37 -0500; because i have one guess i didn't know better <grin> ________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Datsun-roadsters mailing list http://www.team.net/archiv; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00306.html (7,905 bytes)
12. Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: Daniel Solomon <d-solomon@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:09:31 -0700; i guess i'd have to disagree with #2....... ________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Datsun-roadsters mailing list http://www.team.net/archive http://; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00309.html (9,281 bytes)
13. Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: "E Scanlon" <escanlon@wa-net.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:16:51 -0700; Two replies: 1) Because... 2) Why do you ask? E Or is this a not so subtle attempt at having us note your signature line? If so, did you forget to add the "nyah-nyah-nyah-nyah-nyah-blrrrrrrrrt" at th; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00313.html (8,338 bytes)
14. [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? (score: 1): Author: "Gregory S. Morrison" <gsm@gregorysmorrison.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:13:41 -0700; Paul- I guess it's one of those questions: window or aisle, paper or plastic, 1600 or 2000? My first Datsun Roadsters were all 1600s. Many years ago I actually passed on two 67.5 2000s (a nice driver; /html/datsun-roadsters/2008-03/msg00317.html (10,973 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]