Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+9\,500\s+kWh\s+of\s+production\s+in\s+first\s+year\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Shop-talk] 9,500 kWh of production in first year (score: 1)
Author: "old dirtbeard" <dirtbeard@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:00:33 -0700
Hi all, It was one year ago today that we installed a 6 kWh, residential PV system (30 Kyocera 200W panels and a SMA 6000U inverter, located in the Los Angeles area). After 365 days, it has generated
/html/shop-talk/2008-03/msg00120.html (9,303 bytes)

2. Re: [Shop-talk] 9,500 kWh of production in first year (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Parkanzky" <parkanzky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:08:27 -0400
It's very cool! But between our dreary winters and lower energy costs I don't think that we can begin to justify it. Maybe in a few years when we build our dream home. -Paul in Grand Rapids, MI _____
/html/shop-talk/2008-03/msg00121.html (10,557 bytes)

3. Re: [Shop-talk] 9,500 kWh of production in first year (score: 1)
Author: Wayne <wmc_st@xxiii.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:33:03 -0400
Very Cool, Doug! Thanks for the status report. I remember your post from last year. I didn't realize at the time that PV systems had gotten efficient enough to be viable. I've been doing some researc
/html/shop-talk/2008-03/msg00125.html (7,669 bytes)

4. Re: [Shop-talk] 9,500 kWh of production in first year (score: 1)
Author: "Patton Dickson" <57healey@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:25:57 -0500
We don't get the major tax credits in Texas that you get in CA, but I would be interested if it gets down to a 5 to 10 year ROI. The geothermal heat pumps would really be a boost, but system cost is
/html/shop-talk/2008-03/msg00143.html (9,309 bytes)

5. Re: [Shop-talk] 9,500 kWh of production in first year (score: 1)
Author: Jimmie Mayfield <mayfield+shoptalk@sackheads.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:30:07 -0400
Something to keep in mind is the new generation of low-cost panels is here. Last December, a company named Nanosolar announced that it has shipped its first low-cost panels ($1 per watt). As more com
/html/shop-talk/2008-03/msg00144.html (8,834 bytes)

6. Re: [Shop-talk] 9,500 kWh of production in first year (score: 1)
Author: "Patton Dickson" <57healey@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:38:49 -0500
It will be interesting to see how long that takes to reach the market. From what I read here, http://www.solarbuzz.com/Moduleprices.htm , that would be a significant reduction. -- Patton Dickson - ht
/html/shop-talk/2008-03/msg00145.html (8,804 bytes)

7. Re: [Shop-talk] 9,500 kWh of production in first year (score: 1)
Author: Chris Kantarjiev <cak@dimebank.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:48:47 -0700
nanosolar's technology is very promising, but they are on a slow production ramp, and all of their output is already spoken for for at least 12-18 months. end consumers won't see their panels for a c
/html/shop-talk/2008-03/msg00146.html (8,321 bytes)

8. Re: [Shop-talk] 9,500 kWh of production in first year (score: 1)
Author: "David Scheidt" <dmscheidt@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:49:25 -0400
Keep in mind that a constant price for watt, which is what solar has been for the last 2 or three years, is a price decrease, relative to any non-renewable source. The cost per watt of fossil fuel so
/html/shop-talk/2008-03/msg00147.html (8,272 bytes)

9. Re: [Shop-talk] 9,500 kWh of production in first year (score: 1)
Author: "old dirtbeard" <dirtbeard@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:27:46 -0700
Patton, One nice thing about the PV arrays on your roof is that they sit 4-6 inches above the roof so that air flow underneath them will cool them (they generally are efficiency rated at 68F degrees,
/html/shop-talk/2008-03/msg00148.html (9,861 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu