Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shotimes\]\s+driving\s+pet\s+peeves\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shotimes\]\s+driving\s+pet\s+peeves\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "van Oss" <vanOss@centurytel.net>; Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 21:20:45 -0500; Check out: http://www.cnn.com/2006/AUTOS/05/04/pet_peeves/index.html Funny: Seems like #2 and 3 are a set, and #4, 5, and 6 are a set. VO _______________________________________________ Shotimes mail; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00087.html (6,628 bytes)
2. RE: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 21:57:11 -0400; Yeah, #2 & #3 go together, but I also see #4 as a part of that set by the #3 Theoretically, the percent responses for #2 & #3 should be the same (for the complainers and the complainees), but my theo; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00122.html (9,013 bytes)
3. Re: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "Dave Garber" <dave.garber@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 22:50:27 -0400; Well, my feeling is that folks notice they are using a cell phone because they are driving like assmunches (you tend to look over at the a-hole when you pass 'em in disgust). It might not be the cell; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00124.html (9,523 bytes)
4. Re: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: James White <greensho@crown.net>; Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 22:47:23 -0500; Streange as it may be, the cops around here are also cell phone "junkies" while driving. A couple of trips to the home center and I every cop that I spotted was yaking on the cell. Seems as if we tax; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00126.html (10,793 bytes)
5. Re: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "bob fisher" <thunderbird88@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:23:49 -0400; i was just out in monroeville,outside pittsburgh for the weekend.pretty nice area compared to pottsville.lots of things to do and friendly people-unlike out here LOL!did see a nice,red 427 cobra repl; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00127.html (10,982 bytes)
6. Re: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: David Carmean <dlc-sho@halibut.com>; Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:49:44 -0700; ... I commute on a motorcycle. I am "nosing into" the cars for my own safety. It is ABSOLUTELY my business what the drivers around me are doing, and if you don't think so then you are driving in a fa; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00128.html (8,769 bytes)
7. RE: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:28:14 -0400; I had ridden a motorcycle for 25+ years on the street without any incidents, and I call that a different situation. If someone has a headset (especially Bluetooth) you won't see that from the rear. O; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00129.html (9,663 bytes)
8. RE: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: Ron Childs <rbchilds@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:00:31 -0700 (PDT); But how are ya gonna give 'em the Stink Eye? :) -Ron Ron Porter <ronporter@ameritech.net> wrote: One of my pet peeves are people who look into the car next to them as they pass. Now THAT'S dangerous.; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00130.html (7,669 bytes)
9. Re: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "van Oss" <vanOss@centurytel.net>; Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:29:15 -0500; You might be interested in the work of Dr. David Strayer at the University of Utah (http://www.psych.utah.edu/AppliedCognitionLab/). By several measures (reaction time, following distance, response t; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00131.html (8,362 bytes)
10. RE: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:45:51 -0400; Along with driving while tired, having talkative passengers, having unruly kids, reading a map, being basically incompetent, changing iPod selections, etc, etc. IMNSHO, cell phones are the new "whipp; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00132.html (8,898 bytes)
11. RE: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "Sean Simons" <sisimons@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:03:35 -0700; One of my peeves is when I wave to a fellow SHO driver, and they don't wave back, or just scowl. What gives? If they're going to drive a SHO, they really should accept their responsibilities to our t; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00172.html (8,576 bytes)
12. Re: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "Mike Wojton" <mwojton@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:23:56 -0400; When I bought my first SHO I used to try to talk to people I'd see in parking lots that had SHO's. Most often they looked at me weird and walked a little faster towards wherever they were going. Most; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00178.html (9,432 bytes)
13. Re: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "Zach Leahy" <leahyz@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:34:00 -0400; Speaking of that, anyone drive a nice white gen 2 with aftermarket wheels and exhaust down 69 though Ft. Wayne last saturday - had michigan plates. If so it was a good looking car! I was driving the; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00179.html (10,386 bytes)
14. RE: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "Silver Sleeper" <silversleepersho@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:48:39 -0700; I've gotten that too actually. I have a few customers at work that have come in in SHO's, that I've given the URL for SHOtimes, and the NorthWest SHO Club I've always gotten weird looks and raised ey; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00183.html (11,197 bytes)
15. RE: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:49:35 -0400; That's typical!! When I drove the 911, I would see SHOs. When I drove the SHO, I would see 911s. I had considered putting a SHO Club plate frame on the 911, and a PCA frame on the SHO!! Ron Porter --; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00184.html (10,894 bytes)
16. Re: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "van Oss" <vanOss@centurytel.net>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:41:02 -0500; Their point of view has some validity. I confess, on days when my Yamaha engine seems surrounded by Taurus issues, I too begin to think of it as merely a top-of-the-line Taurus. St. Donald of Peoria,; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00192.html (8,245 bytes)
17. RE: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: "Silver Sleeper" <silversleepersho@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:53:05 -0700; I've just come to the conclusion that super high performance Taurus has super high performance issues too, similar to some of the stuff you'd expect from a several year old porche or BMW, minus the g; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00193.html (8,584 bytes)
18. Re: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: Donald Mallinson <dmall@mwonline.net>; Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:23:54 -0500; EVERY enthusiast "vehicle" is owned mostly by non-enthusiasts. The SHO owners here and elsewhere that celebrate the car as something other than basic transportation are a tiny % of the owner group. S; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00195.html (10,605 bytes)
19. Re: [Shotimes] driving pet peeves (score: 1): Author: av8r567@optonline.net; Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:10:48 -0400; When I had my '86 CJ-7 back in the late 80s/90s I would get the "Jeep wave" from EVERY CJ driver I passed. It was kind of hit or miss when the square-headlight XJ Wranglers drivers hit the road - som; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00206.html (12,365 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]