Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Spits\]\s+CV\-Joint\s+driveshaft\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Spits\]\s+CV\-Joint\s+driveshaft\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Spits] CV-Joint driveshaft (score: 1): Author: "v6spitfireguy@cox.net" <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:51:43 -0500; As far as I know, they are not rebuildable, however having said that I would like to know what joint that was actually used because I believe that it is the same joint that Canely Classics uses on th; /html/spitfires/2009-12/msg00029.html (9,404 bytes)
2. Re: [Spits] CV-Joint driveshaft (score: 1): Author: Kevin Rhodes <krhodes1@maine.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:09:08 -0500; Thanks everyone! My suspicion was that it was "non user servicable". At this point it is not causing any issues other than that occasional clang and the fact that if I get under the car I can see th; /html/spitfires/2009-12/msg00035.html (8,788 bytes)
3. Re: [Spits] CV-Joint driveshaft (score: 1): Author: Doug Braun <doug@dougbraun.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:37:53 -0800 (PST); Are you sure that the joint is actually worn that bad? The Spit drive shaft is sort of notorious for vibration when it is not perfectly balanced. If the joint was sloppy enough to allow any significa; /html/spitfires/2009-12/msg00039.html (7,021 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]