Some one was saying they wanted a Berkeley. This would be a good one. The model SE 492 which had larger 3 cylinder 328cc http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Cars-Trucks___1959-Berkeley-SE-492-Roadster-Mi
Vigil, that was me and David Lieb who both liked the one we saw at a micro-car show a couple weeks ago. The problem I see with this one is not having a motor. If the correct one was available, I find
One of my pals in England had a Berkeley but I thought I remembered it being a 3 wheeler with a bigger displacement engine... Cheers!! Jim -- Cheers!! Jim ____________________________________________
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_cars We could also talk about the Turner. .bill http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_%28car_company%29 == --Original Message-- From: spridgets-bounces+corvallis=p
"Excelsior (motorcycle) Talisman three-cylinder 492cc two-stroke engines were fitted to Berkeley cars in the late 1950's." _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.
Larry - Sorry - i did not read he add. I thought it was a complete car. Vigil, that was me and David Lieb who both liked the one we saw at a micro-car show a couple weeks ago. The problem I see with
Larry - Sorry - i did not read he add. I thought it was a complete car. Vigil, that was me and David Lieb who both liked the one we saw at a micro-car show a couple weeks ago. The problem I see with
You are correct Jim both 3 and 4 wheeled versions Also 2 , 3 and 4 cylinder engines have been fitted. Please open the set of pix for more pix of the Berkeley (and 3 wheeled vee twin Morgans and A ser
Thanks for confirming that my memory isn't as bad as it sometimes seems these days!! Yes, the one I recall had 3 wheels and the engine was a fairly large 3 cylinder air cooled affair. I drooled over
Interesting - wikipedia say they two a two cylinder motor. I never knew they made one. All of the ones i owned were 3 cylinders. One was a Royal Infield and the other two had the excelsior motors. Th
Interesting - wikipedia say they two a two cylinder motor. I never knew they made one. _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html http://www.team
With that spelling, you were probably at a hoax site and caught a virus besides ;-) There are no guarantees to the accuracy of anything any more. Even Spridget books are prone to mistakes. Wikipedia
How true - I've found many entries where the "facts" are wrong, and even more where they're maybe not wrong, but aren't quite right either. I've never contributed, but have been told that just about
The bad thing about Wikipedia is that it's written by the general public, and anybody can post anything. The good part is that anybody who knows better can correct it. Did any of you bother to change
Agreed; I keep forgetting that. .bill in oregon _____ There is no guarantee, ever, that wikipdia is correct. == In a message dated 06/08/2008 02:21:00 GMT Daylight Time, uniquelittlecars@yahoo.com wr
Oh, I don't know... For instance, I'd be willing to guarantee that your statement above is true ;-) Cheers!! Jim _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/d
Alternatively some Spridget books do pretty good considering their scope. Even Wikipedia is prone to mistakes. The point I was making was that just because it says so in Wikipedia doesn't meant it is
Ya mean like.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weslake Ed Lieb _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html http://www.team.net/archive http://autox
What I like about wikipedia is that you can 1) edit it, and 2) go look to see who has changed the article. Most of the names mean nothing to me, but I have found a few folks I know. (Hit the History
I just started a new Wiki for "Larry Macy". It's already been completely re-written by 5 neo-facist perverts and 2 gay rights nuts! Cheers!! Jim -- Cheers!! Jim ______________________________________