Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Spridgets\]\s+3\/4\"\s+v\.\s+7\/8\"\s+MC\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Spridgets] 3/4" v. 7/8" MC (score: 1)
Author: "WFO Herb" <froggi60@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:42:38 -0700
Is anyone running 7/8" MC with disc? No reason it shouldn't work, right. May increase pedal sensitivity, require less exerted force. How's about the other-way-around...3/4" with drum? TIA, Herb _____
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00457.html (6,979 bytes)

2. Re: [Spridgets] 3/4" v. 7/8" MC (score: 1)
Author: "brian james" <daredelvis@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:49:25 -0500
I have drums with a 3/4" MC right now. I am getting a little too much pedal travel for my tastes, but I have not had a chance to run it yet and really get the shoes set. At the rate I am moving on th
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00461.html (7,842 bytes)

3. Re: [Spridgets] 3/4" v. 7/8" MC (score: 1)
Author: jomar healey <ah53@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
This site has a good explanation of the differences between drum brake master cylinders and disc brake ones. htmhttp://www.brakecylinder.com/spridgetbrakes.htm Joe I have drums with a 3/4" MC right
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00463.html (9,187 bytes)

4. Re: [Spridgets] 3/4" v. 7/8" MC (score: 1)
Author: Billy Zoom <billyzoom@billyzoom.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:26:53 -0700
I'm taking a survey. How many of you believe this to be true? _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html http://www.team.net/archive http://autox
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00465.html (7,882 bytes)

5. Re: [Spridgets] 3/4" v. 7/8" MC (score: 1)
Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:52:28 -0400
It does work, it does take a little (hardly noticable) more effort with the 7/8 but what I found out is the rear bugeye drum set up with disc fronts makes the back lock up with the front, like just b
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00471.html (7,921 bytes)

6. Re: [Spridgets] 3/4" v. 7/8" MC (score: 1)
Author: Kitterer Bob <bkitterer@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:10:18 -0700
For my two cents I think there are several errors here. Assuming the same size brake line, which for us is normal, the 7/8 piston is attempting to push more fluid through the line for an equal piston
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00477.html (8,907 bytes)

7. Re: [Spridgets] 3/4" v. 7/8" MC (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Weller" <guy.weller@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:46:27 +0100
Thought process starts at the wrong end! The amount of fluid moved depends not on the MC but on the distance needed to take up the slack at the shoes / pads. Changing to a 7/8 MC doesn't effect that
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00479.html (9,436 bytes)

8. Re: [Spridgets] 3/4" v. 7/8" MC (score: 1)
Author: "Robert E. Shlafer" <pilotrob@webtv.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 02:43:56 GMT
Don't know about the numbers, but I've been using a 7/8 MC after upgrading to front discs with normal Frogeye later double rear brake set-up for years and 20k+ miles. Other than pedal press. being a
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00548.html (8,955 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu