Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Spridgets\]\s+gooseneck\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Spridgets] gooseneck (score: 1)
Author: lindalnhvt@nhvt.net
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:25:24 -0400 (EDT)
Hi All, I've put a 1275 from a 74 into a Bugeye using the original type Bugeye radiator. The gooseneck outlet on the 1275 goes toward the driver side. The radiator needs a gooseneck that exits on the
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00820.html (7,054 bytes)

2. Re: [Spridgets] gooseneck (score: 1)
Author: "Jack Laird" <jlaird237@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:36:52 -0500
Will a bugeye, 948 outlet fit? -- http://www.team.net/archive http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00821.html (8,125 bytes)

3. Re: [Spridgets] gooseneck (score: 1)
Author: Ron Soave <soavero@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
"Gooseneck" meaning thermostat cover? You just need an earlier one that points the other way. All of mine are in use at the moment, but I'm sure there's one out there (I'm a big fan of the earlier ra
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00822.html (8,249 bytes)

4. Re: [Spridgets] gooseneck (score: 1)
Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:30:24 -0400
It will if you use the shallow Bugeye thermostat. 1098 covers work as does 1967 1275, 68 went the other way with the cross flow rad. -- Frank Clarici Toms River, NJ __________________________________
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00825.html (7,118 bytes)

5. Re: [Spridgets] gooseneck (score: 1)
Author: Mike/Donna Carpenter <mail4carpenters@peoplepc.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:44:05 -0400 (EDT)
Hey Ron, Why do you favor the earlier downflow rads as opposed to the crossflow version? I am getting ready to drop a 1275 in my MK II Sprite and need to pick which radiator to use. I have one of eac
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00837.html (9,036 bytes)

6. Re: [Spridgets] gooseneck (score: 1)
Author: Kitterer Bob <bkitterer@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:25:50 -0700
A few years back someone on the list who does thermal dynamics (or something closs to that) did an analysis of a stock vertical vs a stock horizontal and there is no difference. The reason for going
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00841.html (8,614 bytes)

7. Re: [Spridgets] gooseneck (score: 1)
Author: CosmicMag1380 <cosmicmag1380@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:11:13 -0600
The reason for going to the cross flow was to lower the bonnet line was the claim. -- Probably not... The bonnet line is the same on the later cars. The crossflow came about with the pollution cars.
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00843.html (8,298 bytes)

8. Re: [Spridgets] gooseneck (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Johnson" <bmwwxman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:30:57 -0500
I talked with Frank and Kevin on the phone last night and this talk about radiators reminded me that Frank still needs a good radiator for the Holy Sprite.... Cheers!! Jim -- Cheers!! Jim ___________
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00847.html (10,577 bytes)

9. Re: [Spridgets] gooseneck (score: 1)
Author: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:32:51 -0500
I have it for him. --Original Message-- From: spridgets-bounces+wsthompson=thicko.com@autox.team.net [mailto:spridgets-bounces+wsthompson=thicko.com@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Jim Johnson Sent: Mon
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00848.html (8,649 bytes)

10. Re: [Spridgets] gooseneck (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Johnson" <bmwwxman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:39:58 -0500
Many thanks, Flounder!! You just knocked a couple of eons off your time in purgatory ;-) Cheers!! Jim _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00849.html (9,205 bytes)

11. Re: [Spridgets] gooseneck (score: 1)
Author: Kitterer Bob <bkitterer@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:37:15 -0700
My mistake, did not mean the Spridgets but on other types of cars. Bob Kitterer 1960 Austin Healey Sprite (Mk IV in disguise) 1966 Austin Healey Sprite Mk III (Trevor) - still in boxes 2000 Miata Spe
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00862.html (9,610 bytes)

12. Re: [Spridgets] gooseneck (score: 1)
Author: Billy Zoom <billyzoom@billyzoom.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:42:59 -0700
So that's why the '68 bonnet is so much lower than the '67? _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html http://www.team.net/archive http://autox.
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00863.html (7,904 bytes)

13. Re: [Spridgets] gooseneck (score: 1)
Author: Ron Soave <soavero@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
Good memory, Bob! In my experience, even with high HP motors, the downflow is fine. I haven't dissected one (yet) but I suspect the downflow has very good flow distribution on the liquid side. Here's
/html/spridgets/2008-08/msg00868.html (10,669 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu