Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Non\-BLC\;\s+Toes\s+in\s+or\s+out\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Non\-BLC\;\s+Toes\s+in\s+or\s+out\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TR] Non-BLC; Toes in or out? (score: 1): Author: "Mark Hooper" <mhooper@digiscreen.ca>; Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:59:53 -0400; Sorry for the non-LBC post, but this list is quite knowlegable on obscure affairs so I thought I'd give it a go. I seized hold of a mahogany dining room set when an aged relative was fumbling with he; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00589.html (7,688 bytes)
2. Re: [TR] Non-BLC; Toes in or out? (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Van Vlack" <jerryvv@adelphia.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:24:38 -0400; Why not one in and one out. That way it will look like it's walking. room looking. the long. 3 a middle? stretches permit == This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register == http://www.; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00590.html (8,142 bytes)
3. RE: [TR] Non-BLC; Toes in or out? (score: 1): Author: "Mark Hooper" <mhooper@digiscreen.ca>; Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:01:37 -0400; You see; why didn't I think of that? It's that sort of expert advice that has kept me coming to the list for so many years. ;^) Oddly enough I do have a book called "Table talks and table travels" I; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00593.html (8,907 bytes)
4. Re: [TR] Non-BLC; Toes in or out? (score: 1): Author: Michael Porter <portermd@zianet.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:29:40 -0600; If Mark does that, the table will start humming "Walk Like an Egyptian" at inconvenient times.... Cheers. -- Michael D. Porter Roswell, NM Never let anyone drive you crazy when you know it's within w; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00595.html (7,141 bytes)
5. Re: [TR] Non-BLC; Toes in or out? (score: 1): Author: BearTranserv@aol.com; Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:48:51 EDT; I'm left wondering. This is the type with 3 feet on each pedestal. Do the toes point out or together? . You could reassemble it like the one in our dining room that our son in law assembled when we m; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00607.html (7,419 bytes)
6. Re: [TR] Non-BLC; Toes in or out? (score: 1): Author: Dave1massey@cs.com; Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:23:27 EDT; Mark, it's your table and you are the one who has to live with it. It is no business of ours how you put the legs on. Just so long as you are happy with it, it doesn't matter if it is as the factory; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00611.html (8,683 bytes)
7. RE: [TR] Non-BLC; Toes in or out? (score: 1): Author: "Mark Hooper" <mhooper@digiscreen.ca>; Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:09:36 -0400; Hi Dave: The only investment I'm thinking about here is the amazing time it took to polish the brass protectors on the feet. Me poor flippers is wore out with all the rubbing. (Does that make me an e; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00612.html (10,191 bytes)
8. Re: [TR] Non-BLC; Toes in or out? (score: 1): Author: Charlie Schlismann <racegt6@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:10:13 -0700 (PDT); Mark, Toe-in allows side chairs to fit nearly snug against the table w/o interference on our v. similar vintage table (acquired under amazingly similar nefarious circumstances). Consider the chairs w; /html/triumphs/2006-10/msg00621.html (8,746 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]