Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+TR6\s+prop\s+shaft\s+removal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+TR6\s+prop\s+shaft\s+removal\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TR] TR6 prop shaft removal (score: 1): Author: Mark Hooper <mhooper@digiscreen.ca>; Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 11:49:17 -0400; On a trip back from Monterey today via highway 156 and 101. I saw a truck with a GT6 and 2 old jags on it. The truck was next to the auto breaker just by this junctions. Sujit -- Sujit Roy, Realtor K; /html/triumphs/2010-04/msg00065.html (7,769 bytes)
2. Re: [TR] TR6 prop shaft removal (score: 1): Author: Tony Drews <tony@tonydrews.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 12:54:56 -0500; If I'm remembering the bearings correctly, the answer is NO. I prefer the non-caged bearing. Fewer but bigger rollers. My trans is a TR-6 with a conglomeration of various years parts inside. I origin; /html/triumphs/2010-04/msg00068.html (9,057 bytes)
3. Re: [TR] TR6 prop shaft removal (score: 1): Author: Dave1massey@cs.com; Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 20:36:50 EDT; It has to not only not touch; but leave some clearance for axle movement. Personally, I would just tap the pipes farther together. It will be somewhere between PITA and impossible to separate that j; /html/triumphs/2010-04/msg00079.html (8,583 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]