- 1. [TR] an article for the afternoon... (score: 1)
- Author: "David Templeton" <davidt@opentext.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:24:06 -0500
- Hi all, FYI, not an overly bad synopsis of the Spitfire http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/bv/63-80spitfire.htm A little light reading more than anything for a Friday afternoon.... David Templeto
- /html/triumphs/2008-03/msg00165.html (7,240 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TR] an article for the afternoon... (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Muller" <jimmuller@rcn.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:14:01 -0500
- Hmmmmmmm. The writer sez: That would have been a nice upgrade but it isn't BL did, unless they put a different suspension on the U.S. cars as for Canada cars. The Mk IV got the swing-spring, a varian
- /html/triumphs/2008-03/msg00174.html (8,058 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TR] an article for the afternoon... (score: 1)
- Author: "John Macartney" <standardtriumph@btinternet.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 23:18:36 -0000
- In addition, he also said that in 1964, the Mk 1 offered a factory hardtop of fibreglass. Hmm. Only Spitfires I know with factory hardtops had them in steel and up to and including the Mk 3 those top
- /html/triumphs/2008-03/msg00178.html (8,260 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TR] an article for the afternoon... (score: 1)
- Author: pethier@comcast.net
- Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 02:37:47 +0000
- Oh good. It's not just me. -- Phil Ethier West Side Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1962 Triumph TR4 CT2846L, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1993 Suburban, 1994 Miata C package pethier [at] comcast [dot] net http://forum
- /html/triumphs/2008-03/msg00184.html (8,621 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu