Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+testing\s+triumphs\@autox\.team\.net\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: pethier@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:57:52 +0000 (UTC)
No problem on my end in CA....Merry Christmas. What makes you think it isn't working?=A0 Are you sending messages that are= n't showing up?=A0 Are you checking http://www.team.net/archive and seeing
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00199.html (7,541 bytes)

2. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: <wbeech@flash.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:05:41 -0700
No problems in SC Al _______________________________________________ Triumphs@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Suggested annual donation $11.47 Archive: http://www.team.net/arch
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00200.html (8,681 bytes)

3. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: Frank Fisher <yellowtr3@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:07:10 -0800 (PST)
So someone sends a message to the list asking if it is broken. You receive this message and concur that the list is not working because you aren't getting any messages. I see. mjb. __________________
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00201.html (8,540 bytes)

4. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: "Craig" <wensley_tr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:03:17 -0500
When I check the archives, responses from Randall never hit my mailbox. (no, not stuck in a SPAM filter) Don't know why your system picks on just his emails. Bill Beecher '58 TR-3A TS30766L "Tarbaby
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00202.html (9,534 bytes)

5. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: pethier@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:15:55 +0000 (UTC)
Mine is safely away from the snow but I'm afraid instead of being bedded down while the snow covers the ground and salt the highways, mine id being molested. The hard top and boot lid are off getting
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00203.html (9,435 bytes)

6. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: "Andrew Uprichard" <auprichard@uprichard.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:12:01 -0500
It does seem that messages are posting. I started the question off-list to confirm that others were not getting anything. Traffic was unusually light for several days - even over the weekend. There w
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00204.html (11,808 bytes)

7. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Danielson" <75tr6@tr6.danielsonfamily.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:32:44 -0500
You need to delete the other messages that are tagging along with it. _______________________________________________ Triumphs@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Suggested annual
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00210.html (11,647 bytes)

8. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Laurito" <trglory@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:10:42 -0500
My initial message didn't have any tagging along with it and it was shorter than some of the ones I see on here. You need to delete the other messages that are tagging along with it. ________________
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00211.html (12,685 bytes)

9. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: Bud Rolofson <levilevi@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:56:33 -0700
Yes, you're both correct as far as I know. Both the late TR6 PI and late Carb models had the 311399 cam with specs below. The early TR6 PI cam (307689) produced 150 BHP, and had timings of 35-65/65-3
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00212.html (8,644 bytes)

10. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: Mark J Bradakis <mark@bradakis.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:08:31 -0700
This is ridiculous. I have been trying to send out a thank-you message for 24 hours and it keeps rejecting it because it is too big. Not so, but here is the abrupt version. I'm going to sell my TR4 a
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00215.html (7,828 bytes)

11. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: P Caffrey <pcaffrey@ymail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:12:50 -0800 (PST)
And that is a Good Thing, IMO. I certainly do not want to have to pay the extra cost of 100% incoming inspection. Remember that $700 hammer? If you start listing all the ways that such an item could
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00216.html (9,696 bytes)

12. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: "Al Salvatore" <tr6parts@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:21:27 -0500
When power output dropped from 150 to 125 with the introduction of the mild= cam, the factory claimed it had improved torque.=A0IMHO I always felt the e= arlier = PI car had more=A0torque than the la
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00217.html (10,420 bytes)

13. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: Mark J Bradakis <mark@bradakis.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:45:47 -0700
_______________________________________________ Triumphs@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Suggested annual donation $11.47 Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://w
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00218.html (8,578 bytes)

14. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: <wbeech@flash.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:45:17 -0700
Hi listers, Where would I get product support for the Heritage Motor Centre branded "manuals on a CD" product. I've just discovered it no longer works once you upgrade your PC to Windows 7 and since
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00219.html (9,645 bytes)

15. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: "TeriAnn J. Wakeman" <tjwakeman@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:17:59 -0700
It is my understanding that the software only works up to Windows XP - Windows Vista or 7 will not work. I know for a fact that it doesn't work with VIsta - ISTR that someone on the list said the sam
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00220.html (8,796 bytes)

16. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: cfmtr3a@verizon.net
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:26:47 -0600 (CST)
First, let me wish everyone happy, safe, and peaceful holidays! I've been out of touch for a few months, it seems. Way too much to do, some mechanical. Lately I've been in a slow process to bring bac
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00221.html (9,944 bytes)

17. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Scarbrough <fishplate@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:27:09 -0500
My TR4 came goopless on the timing cover. I've seen other engines with goop, and it looks like a scooped handful, a dollop, on the cover. I don't know what the material was, but the Spit cover that I
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00222.html (8,507 bytes)

18. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: "LBC.Resto" <lbc.resto@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:11:52 -0500
There is some chatter on the 'net about how to defeat the copy protection scheme. Try Googling for 'hexalock'. However, you'll need a working XP machine to defeat the copy protection. Once you've got
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00225.html (11,497 bytes)

19. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: "Al Salvatore" <tr6parts@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:24:00 -0500
enter ratsportscouk=A0 in web search and klick on web search=A0 then klick = on=A0 Its = Nearly Christmas.=A0=A0 LOTS of neat stuff and prices seem reasonable ________________________________________
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00227.html (8,960 bytes)

20. Re: [TR] testing triumphs@autox.team.net (score: 1)
Author: "LBC.Resto" <lbc.resto@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:57:08 -0500
I remember cleaning the goop off the last engine i re-built and simply re-finishing with paint. Maybe it's my imagination but I think I can now hear the "steely" sound of the timing chain whirling if
/html/triumphs/2010-12/msg00228.html (8,450 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu