Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+289\'s\s+in\s+Mark\s+1\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+289\'s\s+in\s+Mark\s+1\'s\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] 289's in Mark 1's (score: 1): Author: "rande" <rande@thecia.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:19:33 -0500; I think it's likely that the RM Clarke book was in error. According to Norm Millers book, the third and final 260 order would have exceeded the total production of Mark 1A's, and hypothetically it wo; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00205.html (7,178 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] 289's in Mark 1's (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:53:16 -0600; Agreed. As cool as it would be to have a 'one-of-a-small-number' Tiger, the evidence as compiled by Norm and others that have done research based on factory records goes against five-bolt 289's ever; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00206.html (9,120 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]