Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+5\s+bolt\s+289\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+5\s+bolt\s+289\s+\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] 5 bolt 289 ? (score: 1): Author: Allan Ballard <allanballard@att.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:18:22 -0500; Recently I bought a 5 bolt 289, intending to rebuild and install in my Tiger, or to swap it as a core for a crate motor. However it has differences... For example something resembling a fuel pump is; /html/tigers/2010-11/msg00091.html (7,550 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] 5 bolt 289 ? (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:00:16 -0800; I have a 5 bolt 289 in my early Tiger. I did not put it in, so I can't tell you everything involved. But having studied the install I will offer the following: 1. Yes, you will need a 5 bolt bellhou; /html/tigers/2010-11/msg00092.html (8,280 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] 5 bolt 289 ? (score: 1): Author: Randall Antosiak <randya@pacbell.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:13:19 -0800 (PST); Hi Allan - I put a 5 bolt 289 in my Tiger a few years back, and I don't recall any problems bolting up the Tiger peripherals. I had problems only where I decided to upgrade my engine, like with GT40; /html/tigers/2010-11/msg00093.html (8,513 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] 5 bolt 289 ? (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:35:13 -0500; The 260 and the 289 engine block are basically the same casting design starting in 1963 and all the peripherals will bolt on. The Tiger has a block off plate over the fuel pump position. The 260 has; /html/tigers/2010-11/msg00095.html (8,924 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] 5 bolt 289 ? (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:42:53 -0500; Timing chain cover is a stock Ford part and the water pump is also stock Ford. The position of the flange for the fan on the water pump is the only difference. If you still have the original parts yo; /html/tigers/2010-11/msg00096.html (9,152 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] 5 bolt 289 ? (score: 1): Author: Allan Ballard <allanballard@att.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:34:16 -0500; The casting # is C4OE 6016C. I think that means a 1964 289. Allan _______________________________________________ Tigers@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.te; /html/tigers/2010-11/msg00104.html (9,497 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] 5 bolt 289 ? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hokanson" <tgrrr@peoplepc.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:59:13 -0800; According to my High Performance Ford Engine Parts Interchange book the casting number C40E 6015C would be correct for a 63-64 289 engine block. It shows all engine block casting numbers as 6015 but; /html/tigers/2010-11/msg00111.html (11,598 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]