Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+A\s+better\s+way\s+to\s+communicate\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+A\s+better\s+way\s+to\s+communicate\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Tigers] A better way to communicate (score: 1): Author: John Crawley <alittlemoreink@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:10:21 +0000; Hi All: One thing that would help communications for some of us with slower connections (and those who subscribe to the Digest version of the List) is for everyone to delete all the previous communic; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00269.html (7,443 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] A better way to communicate (score: 1): Author: "Steven L. Finberg" <w1gsl@MIT.EDU>; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:34:55 -0400; No... A thousand times No. Edit what you are responding to. But make sure we know WHAT and WHO you are responding to. It is much too easy to lose the thread if you remove eveything. Subjects often a; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00270.html (7,781 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] A better way to communicate (score: 1): Author: Cullen McCann <cmccann@lwpb.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:41:53 -0700; What do you guys think about it when someone leaves a line of the previous conversation like this: ".....Edit what you are responding to. But make sure we know WHAT and WHO you are responding to.....; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00271.html (7,163 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]