- 1. [Tigers] Alger ?? Tiger ??? (score: 1)
- Author: <sralsten@ca.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:06:31 -0400
- Although I am still reading, looking at cars and shopping for a car. This whole of Algers/TAC is nearly enough to drive one away from interest in the marque and probably has driven many away. If I sp
- /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00036.html (9,370 bytes)
- 2. [Tigers] Alger ?? Tiger ??? (score: 1)
- Author: <sralsten@ca.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:06:58 -0400
- Although I am still reading, looking at cars and shopping for a car. This whole of Algers/TAC is nearly enough to drive one away from interest in the marque and probably has driven many away. If I sp
- /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00037.html (9,381 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Tigers] Alger ?? Tiger ??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott Hutchinson" <shutchin@netjets.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:13:08 -0400
- Now you know why they are rare, fun and interesting cars and yet still fairly Seems like a great group of owners too. Can't imagine the e-type guys have anywhere near the fun we do. ;) Scott Hutchins
- /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00038.html (7,862 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Tigers] Alger ?? Tiger ??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Rense, Mark (GE Indust, ConsInd)" <mark.rense@ge.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:09:46 -0400
- First of all, welcome to this little conclave of anal-retentive anarchists! You have discovered a little dirty secret: Tigers are one of the few iconic classic car types that do not seem to suffer f
- /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00039.html (10,056 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Tigers] Alger ?? Tiger ??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:10:24 -0700
- Steve, The authentisity relates to the fact that the unibody structure was one that was originally altered by Jensen, and initially sold as a Tiger. It does not have to do with the fact that the car
- /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00040.html (9,103 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu