Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Are\s+This\s+a\s+Tiger\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Are\s+This\s+a\s+Tiger\?\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <slaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:48:05 -0700; See who actually signed the TAC certificate. It is ON the certificate. Norman's web site also contains a list of certified and assigned TAC numbers: http://www.rootes1.com/ I am getting very suspici; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00029.html (8,744 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: "Jim" <jim@island.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:41:11 -0700; What are you suspicious about exactly? No, it doesn't have 'tie-downs' and we all know what it looks like...but it HAS been TAC'ed .... and I only know of one car that was TAC'ed and turned out it w; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00030.html (9,877 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <slaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:13:35 -0700; There is no argument, other than your own statement: "I don't see the Mk II specific spare tire tie downs and the battery tie down is wrong - .Jim" Apparently I did got the idea that all was not as; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00032.html (8,823 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: Randy Smith <RSSmithIQ@cs.com>; Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:13:46 -0400; Jim is a TAC inspector and owns a Mk II, so I would think he knows what he is talking about. -Randy - Randy Smith INNER QUEST, Inc. 34752 Charles Town Pike Purcellville, VA 20132 703-478-1078 540-66; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00033.html (9,473 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: Jim Sencindiver <jd.sencindiver@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:03:40 -0400; On Mk II Tigers they did away with the "bolted hat" that was used on Mk I and Mk IAs and used a couple of straps to hold the spare in place. The straps were attached to brackets/tie downs that were; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00034.html (9,339 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <slaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:37:29 -0700; Thank you for the "hands-on" Mk II information. While I don't know all the TAC criteria, the main one is that it rolled off the assembly line as a Tiger. Putting a Chevy Engine in is allowed. Apprec; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00035.html (10,364 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: Tony Somebody <achd73@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 21:44:42 -0700 (PDT); As Jim mentioned, the rear clip may have been replaced or, for example, I have a nice complete trunk platform from epay- it was cut above the frame rails but looks new on the bottom- I just bought it; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00036.html (10,348 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: "Would U. Believe" <porsche911E@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 07:01:29 -0400; I was going to say... It's funny how one can think s/he knows something and then doubt that knowledge. I knew there was a new spare tire securing system in the MKII and a fuel pump in the Alpine's sp; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00037.html (11,314 bytes)
9. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: FHSLOTH13@aol.com; Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 09:02:22 EDT; My MKII used the trunk well for the fuel pump, so it was not unused. "Here I am envisioning a leather set of belts to hold the spare against the froward end of the trunk to tie it down vertically in; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00039.html (8,848 bytes)
10. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: "Jim" <jim@island.net>; Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 09:23:54 -0700; BTW, I believe that every car that has been TAC'd is unequivocally a real Tiger. What I was referencing below was a discrepancy in the VIN# which is something outside of the TAC program as has no bea; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00040.html (11,872 bytes)
11. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: Dave Munroe <dave@munroe.ca>; Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:56:21 -0300; You asked: " The one question I have is about the hole through the rear rail to the left (driver's side) of the left exhaust bank near the drive shaft. That is something I do not recognize and don't; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00041.html (8,083 bytes)
12. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: "Greg Koss" <Greg.Koss@TRW.COM>; Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:02:31 -0400; That hole in the X-member is where the Alpine exhaust was routed. You asked: " The one question I have is about the hole through the rear rail to the left (driver's side) of the left exhaust bank nea; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00042.html (8,501 bytes)
13. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: "Would U. Believe" <mcdangerous@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:39:23 -0400; Ummmmm..... How can that be if the car is a TACed MkII Tiger? Is what you are saying that the car is a fraud (Alger)? _______________________________________________ Tigers@autox.team.net Donate: htt; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00043.html (10,587 bytes)
14. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: atwittsend@verizon.net; Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:51:07 -0500 (CDT); /VIKFgV: Permission denied _______________________________________________ Tigers@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://www.team.n; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00044.html (8,379 bytes)
15. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:14:17 -0500; built X frame, presumably to replace rotted original components. That doesn't make it an Alger, nor would the use of X frame components from an Alpine in an eventual re-restoration (in the absence o; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00045.html (9,958 bytes)
16. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: "Scattt" <scattt@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 18:14:25 -0400; It sounds like the hole you are describing is the Alpine exhaust passage which is present on all Tigers. Nick -- Original Message -- From: "Would U. Believe" <porsche911E@verizon.net> To: "Jim Sencin; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00046.html (10,035 bytes)
17. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: "Would U. Believe" <mcdangerous@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 18:29:53 -0400; Theo, That's the way I see it too. I was just surprised to see "that's where the alpine exhaust passed through without qualifying the statement. Thanks. M ____________________________________________; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00047.html (10,303 bytes)
18. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: Tom Parker <tkparker1941@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:53:16 -0400; "How can that be if the car is a TACed MkII Tiger? Is what you are saying that the car is a fraud (Alger)?" They all have it. Tigers are, simply put, Alpines modified at the plant. I've had my Mark 2; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00048.html (9,510 bytes)
19. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: David T Johnson <djoh797014@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:30:24 -0700 (PDT); You're not talking about the speedo access hole on my late MKiA's left rail. Placed perfectly to allow a very long socket + extension to reach the speed drive gear and hold down bolt. Changing the ge; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00050.html (9,283 bytes)
20. Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger? (score: 1): Author: Dave Munroe <dave@munroe.ca>; Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 21:51:58 -0300; No way am I going to argue with the experts on this list which includes a TAC inspector, and not having my car handy to look and see if it has that very same hole, but on this car in question, that'; /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00051.html (9,904 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]