Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+BMW\s+gas\s+$not\s+gasoline$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+BMW\s+gas\s+$not\s+gasoline$\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] BMW Gas (NOT Gasoline) (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:28:50 -0700; New L.A.Times article about BMW and Hydrogen Cars. BMW new "Hydrogen 7" has a hydrogen gas fueled prototypes on the road in SoCal. They are loaned to actors and actresses, sports figures, opera star; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00157.html (8,890 bytes)
2. [Tigers] BMW Gas (NOT Gasoline) (score: 1): Author: "William Lau" <mrlau@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:36:50 -0500; --To top it off, while the car may be pollution free, the making of the hydrogen takes more energy than it provides in the car. And it ain't cheap.-- Steve, it is cheap when you and I are paying to s; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00158.html (9,010 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] BMW Gas (NOT Gasoline) (score: 1): Author: "Scott Hutchinson" <shutchin@netjets.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:41:38 -0400; I think the common wisdom is now that the silver nitrate (could have the exact compound wrong) in the fabric covering of the Hindenberg was what caused the fire and not the Hydrogen. Scott Hutchinson; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00159.html (7,617 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] BMW Gas (NOT Gasoline) (score: 1): Author: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:09:20 -0600; In one of last year's Mythbusters episodes, they noted that the Hindenburg was covered with a two-layer finish, the first of which contained iron oxide and the second layer contained aluminum particl; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00160.html (7,337 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] BMW Gas (NOT Gasoline) (score: 1): Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:45:30 -0700; As Steve says...H2 is merely a storage medium. It only gives back exactly what it takes to produce it. And the heat available is 1/5, if I remember correctl;y, that of gasoline. So it take a lot of H; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00162.html (10,611 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] BMW Gas (NOT Gasoline) (score: 1): Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:46:21 -0700; As Steve says...H2 is merely a storage medium. It only gives back exactly what it takes to produce it. And the heat available is 1/5, if I remember correctl;y, that of gasoline. So it take a lot of H; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00163.html (10,608 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] BMW Gas (NOT Gasoline) (score: 1): Author: "A. C. Tynes" <v8tracker@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:54:04 -0500; The Mythbusters episode dealing with the Hindenberg was rerun recently. The conclusion was that the fabric and the hydrogen combined to cause the fire. They duplicated the fabric and found that it wo; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00164.html (7,819 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] BMW Gas (NOT Gasoline) (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:17:19 -0700; Discovery Channel, Myth Busters, claims that their extreme test would NOT ignite even when highly combustible thermite was over-loaded into the aluminum paint. That may be "common wisdom", but a rea; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00165.html (8,988 bytes)
9. Re: [Tigers] BMW Gas (NOT Gasoline) (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <chris@cthompson.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:31:00 -0400; An acquaintance of mine who is a big-shot at one of the leading gas-supplying companies has been buying up all the methane resources around the world he can for years now. It's such a cheap resource,; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00166.html (10,239 bytes)
10. Re: [Tigers] BMW Gas (NOT Gasoline) (score: 1): Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:09:53 -0700; Aaahhh, since methane is a far worse green house gas than CO2 then we can blame him for global warming when it is accidentally released, lol. Just pulling your chain a bit... Seriously I do no think; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00167.html (10,860 bytes)
11. Re: [Tigers] BMW gas (not gasoline) (score: 1): Author: Tod Brown <todbrown@roadrunner.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:54:27 -0400; Well, I am sure there will be accidents with hydrogen, if and when it ever comes to be used to power autos. On the other hand, we also have accidents occasionally with gasoline. It is one of the reas; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00170.html (9,110 bytes)
12. Re: [Tigers] BMW gas (not gasoline) (score: 1): Author: "William Lau" <mrlau@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:43:52 -0500; -- Yes, H2 is an energy sink, but what are the alternatives? -- This is like saying something is stupid but let's do it anyway 'cause it makes us feel like we are doing something good. It takes oil t; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00174.html (10,543 bytes)
13. Re: [Tigers] BMW gas (not gasoline) (score: 1): Author: Tod Brown <todbrown@roadrunner.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:46:09 -0400; "This is like saying something is stupid but let's do it anyway 'cause it makes us feel like we are doing something good. It takes oil to cram the hydrogen in the bottle and it takes oil to process i; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00179.html (9,925 bytes)
14. Re: [Tigers] BMW gas (not gasoline) (score: 1): Author: "Rense, Mark (GE Indust, ConsInd)" <mark.rense@ge.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:29:23 -0400; You are correct, it is not a smart thing to do from an energy balance point of view...today. However, if you had a large amount of cheap and clean electrical power from solar, wind or..dare I say...n; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00182.html (9,826 bytes)
15. Re: [Tigers] BMW gas (not gasoline) (score: 1): Author: "William Lau" <mrlau@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:47:07 -0500; As long as it takes oil to process whatever is done and it takes more oil energy than is gained by the process, it is foolish. The only energy source that is viable at this time is nuclear and that e; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00183.html (9,997 bytes)
16. Re: [Tigers] BMW gas (not gasoline) (score: 1): Author: Stephen Waybright <gswaybright@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:13:54 -0700 (PDT); I don't understand why the neclear option doesn't surface more often in the energy dialog. Technology has come a long long way since the last Nuc plant design and I don't hear a bunch of issues about; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00184.html (9,086 bytes)
17. Re: [Tigers] BMW gas (not gasoline) (score: 1): Author: "Chris and Jodie" <cjcoffel@sonic.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:17:03 -0700; Just go watch 'Who killed the Electric Car". They've got 50,00 gas stations and they aren't going to let that business model die with electric cars. Chris http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/004825.; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00185.html (11,727 bytes)
18. Re: [Tigers] BMW gas (not gasoline) (score: 1): Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:08:58 -0700; Folks, the demands on nuclear saftey are still paramount. While accidents are few and far between, when they happen they can be really bad. So stewardship of safety cannot be surrendered to technolog; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00188.html (11,611 bytes)
19. Re: [Tigers] BMW gas (not gasoline) (score: 1): Author: "Scott Hutchinson" <shutchin@netjets.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:17:50 -0400; We could all use this as an excuse to buy a Tesla. Slap a few solar panels on the roof of the garage and drive for free. Tell the bride it's all in the name of saving money and preserving the environ; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00189.html (8,685 bytes)
20. [Tigers] BMW gas (not gasoline) (score: 1): Author: "William Lau" <mrlau@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:03:39 -0500; I'm with you. If the French can do it, we can do it easily. Use coal and nuclear to make electricity for electric cars to work in the city. Eventually they will get good enough to go long distances.; /html/tigers/2008-06/msg00199.html (7,294 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]