Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Balancing\s+and\s+flywheel\s+confusion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Balancing\s+and\s+flywheel\s+confusion\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Balancing and flywheel confusion (score: 1): Author: <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 9:59:03 -0500; I check the archives and did not find a good answer (for me) on this. My 1991 347 has been balanced to 28 oz with a flexplate. The flexplate has a 1" X 2" weight welded to it with some of the materia; /html/tigers/2010-04/msg00144.html (7,582 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Balancing and flywheel confusion (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:39:36 -0500; If the 28 oz-in. flexplate was properly in spec (i.e. it has the right mass at the right angular offset relative to the way the crank bolt holes are drilled) then you should be able to substitute a 2; /html/tigers/2010-04/msg00147.html (8,954 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Balancing and flywheel confusion (score: 1): Author: Owain Lloyd <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:40:32 +0200; based on my own experience (for what its worth...): yes, 157 unless you have a particularly odd bell housing. do you have the part no? no need to rebalance if you are sure its balanced well for 28"oz; /html/tigers/2010-04/msg00148.html (9,663 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Balancing and flywheel confusion (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:08:30 -0400; I have never gone through the balancing process but I highly recommend it. I suggest you talk to a shop that does that kind of work. Early V8s were balanced to 28 oz; beginning in 1985 balance was c; /html/tigers/2010-04/msg00149.html (9,436 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] Balancing and flywheel confusion (score: 1): Author: "Jerry & Maureen $Mo$" <JCMC2006@suddenlink.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:17:23 -0500; I also have a 1991 engine (roller blocks the only way to go); I used the stock 50oz weight. The only problem I see with yours is when it was balanced they may have drilled on the flexplate to get the; /html/tigers/2010-04/msg00156.html (10,038 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] Balancing and flywheel confusion (score: 1): Author: spook01@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:17:31 +0000 (UTC); you don't need a full rebalance no matter what. only the harmonic, crank, if you don't spot drilling use the wheel as is. you might want to call wherever the crate engine came from and ask if they di; /html/tigers/2010-04/msg00158.html (10,976 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] Balancing and flywheel confusion (score: 1): Author: "Wally Menke" <walmenke@bigpond.net.au>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:34:49 +1000; With a 347 go with the 164? bigger flywheel that the 11" clutch will fit to. The extra size will make a long term difference with the increase in torque you will get. You will need the bigger / late; /html/tigers/2010-04/msg00168.html (9,374 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]