Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Bent\s+Tiger\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Bent\s+Tiger\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Bent Tiger (score: 1): Author: vegaslegal@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:30:32 -0400; I've previously dealt with this subject and taken some heat on it.? From a legal perspective, as a general rule, the vin plate defines the car.? Normally this will be attached to the cowl such that t; /html/tigers/2009-03/msg00142.html (7,956 bytes)
2. [Tigers] Bent Tiger (score: 1): Author: "Fabbro" <fabbro@shaw.ca>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:03:21 -0700; The Vegas guy is right. It is the same here in our location. Just because a person uses an Alpine fender, trunk floor, door or a 302 block instead of the original 260/289 will not make it any thing b; /html/tigers/2009-03/msg00143.html (7,765 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Bent Tiger (score: 1): Author: "Ross" <ross_hulse@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:14:49 -0700; Actually, the statements below are not completely accurate. The best way to insure that the body shell came off the Jensen line is to have the car TAC'd. Or have a TAC inspector look it over if in d; /html/tigers/2009-03/msg00144.html (8,361 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Bent Tiger (score: 1): Author: spook01@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:08:55 +0000 (UTC); as i recall, a few years ago the rootes trophy was held by a tac'd Mk 2 that turned out to be a ...fake.B Kim, Actually, the statements below are not completely accurate. B The best way to insure tha; /html/tigers/2009-03/msg00146.html (9,224 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] Bent Tiger (score: 1): Author: spook01@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:12:02 +0000 (UTC); loads of these cars (real ones)B have had the tags removed and then re attached.B the company that made the original rivets that held the plates on is still in business and sells the odd little rivet; /html/tigers/2009-03/msg00147.html (8,944 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] Bent Tiger (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:53:44 EDT; While I do not agree with the premise of 'its a Tiger only if the VIN is pop otherwise its not.' What about those long term owners who had their care repainted before pop rivets were an issue. Some h; /html/tigers/2009-03/msg00150.html (7,859 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] Bent Tiger (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:09:42 -0700; Dave, and Tigers, Here in the "Land of Fruits and Nuts" the CA State law requires approval before a body shop can remove the VIN form a car. They do issue this approval to body shops, and require sta; /html/tigers/2009-03/msg00151.html (8,757 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]