- 1. [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: "Would U. Believe" <mcdangerous@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:16:40 -0400
- So, I'm wondering about carburetion. On my 260, per expert advice, I have a Holley 465 CFM carburetor installed -- sitting on an old Edelbrock F4B. The question is about my 289, which I'm in the proc
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00220.html (7,225 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:30:47 +1000
- You would have to be a moron to fit a 715 on a mild 289, especially given you are running stock MKII motor.. ie stock heads and valves..? Even 600 would be more than enough... no point bolting on a b
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00222.html (9,398 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: "wsamouce" <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:13:25 -0500
- Screw Holley..........put a 1.08 Autolite 4100 on that 289. I have a 65 Mustang 4100 on my 260 and it runs like a scalded dog. It cold starts like a champ and idles at 700 rpm. I had a 650 Holley on
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00223.html (9,538 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: "Would U. Believe" <mcdangerous@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:31:28 -0400
- Yeah, I think you're right. Probably, anything over 600 cubic feet per minute flow is just too much. I was just curious to hear confirmations of that. I will probably move the 465 CFM over to the 289
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00225.html (10,565 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: "Would U. Believe" <mcdangerous@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:46:08 -0400
- Jeez...Someone wake up on the wrong side of the bed? Trust me, I9m no moron. That9s why I asked the question. I get it, you prefer to hotrod a Tiger with a 5.0 or a 302 or other engine that never act
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00226.html (10,027 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:21:50 +1000
- Moron was probaly not the word to use.. and it was not aimed at you.. more a general comment about people putting the laregest carb on a motor thinking that gives them more power/faster car. However
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00227.html (9,129 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: Sandy Ganz <sganz@pacbell.net>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
- Give this a try to see where you end up... http://www.gtsparkplugs.com/CarbCFMCalc.html Sandy -- Original Message -- From: Would U. Believe <mcdangerous@verizon.net> To: Tigers Den <tigers@autox.team
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00228.html (8,674 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:12:30 -0400
- Carb choice depends on many factors; fuel pump is one. The stock fuel pump will only support an engine around 200 HP. More HP requires more fuel pump and more carb; ditto for more RPM's. All the carb
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00229.html (9,985 bytes)
- 9. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: Tony Somebody <achd73@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
- Very good post Ron and so right on. I wonder what U could make my mild cam 302, I think(PO installed) with a Dale A. AMC 5 speed conversion kit -TtT installed. Certainly over 30 with your brain and t
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00231.html (8,551 bytes)
- 10. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: mcdangerous@verizon.net
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:05:02 -0500 (CDT)
- _______________________________________________ Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00232.html (8,056 bytes)
- 11. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: "wsamouce" <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:44:29 -0500
- Are you using an Autolite 2100? What jet size in that two barrel? My 4100 has 50 for primary jets. A 320 mile trip recently yielded 16.8 MPG. Seeing how I am running on the primaries only during cru
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00233.html (11,988 bytes)
- 12. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: mcdangerous@verizon.net
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:41:58 -0500 (CDT)
- Thanks for that. I will go with the 465 Holley. It's running well-tuned on the 260, so it's a known quantity. I want to be sure to thank everybody for their help and advice. Cheers! Carb choice depen
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00234.html (10,398 bytes)
- 13. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:58:04 -0400
- BTW, when the Tiger ran I'd have been proud to get 18 - 20 MPG at highway speeds. I think 28 MPG is a tad high with a 4 speed, improbable even with a carbureted engine and a 5 speed, but probable wit
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00235.html (9,840 bytes)
- 14. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:44:31 -0700
- Another option is the Edelbrock (Carter). The way the secondaries work give a bit of latitude with a larger carburetor. I picked up an Edelbrock (cheap - of course) that is a 625 CFM. My 289 has an u
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00236.html (9,814 bytes)
- 15. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Parker <tkparker1941@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:04:07 -0400
- I'm certainly not doubting you, and you've given me something to shoot for. Thanks! Tom _______________________________________________ Tigers@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00237.html (9,828 bytes)
- 16. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:33:17 -0500
- Back when we measured in gallons (Canada went metric in '76), Canada used Imperial gallons, so that would be 4.54 litres where a US gallon is 3.78. The Tiger's fuel tank capacity (as displayed on the
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00238.html (11,569 bytes)
- 17. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: CoolVT@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:18:38 EDT
- US gallon= 128oz. Canadian Imperial Gallon 135.26 oz. In a message dated 6/21/2010 6:28:03 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, atwittsend@verizon.net writes: Another option is the Edelbrock (Carter). The way
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00239.html (10,036 bytes)
- 18. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: CoolVT@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:21:21 EDT
- Hey, how fast do you guys drive:-) Someone wrote and talked about 3,800 rpm at 78 mph. Do you really have place where you can cruise at 78? If so, I can see why the mileage suffers. Mark In a message
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00240.html (10,217 bytes)
- 19. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: David Sosna <sosnaenergyconsulting@cox.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:45:09 -0700
- Best Regards and have a great drive in Oct! David Sosna __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5216 (20100621) __________ The message was checked by ESE
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00241.html (9,471 bytes)
- 20. Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor(s) for the Tiger (score: 1)
- Author: "Buck Trippel" <BuckTrippel@Verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:51:05 -0700
- Last summer we drove one of our Tigers over 3500 miles in ten days to & from It was equipped with a H-Po 289 & a Holley 600 cfm Vac secondary carb with a T-5. To the seat of the pants, the felt great
- /html/tigers/2010-06/msg00242.html (11,363 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu