Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Camber\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Camber\s+question\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Camber question (score: 1): Author: "Lynn Wall" <cars@wt-inc.com>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:18:10 -0600; Hey all, First let me say thanks to all the vets out there. Your sacrifice is appreciated. Second I am trying to align my tiger and the camber has me puzzled. The owner s manual says 3 degrees 50 min; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00162.html (7,823 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Camber question (score: 1): Author: "Ross" <ross_hulse@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 08:56:02 -0700; That s, CASTER not CAMBER! The spec for camber is 30 115 positive. Ross "Commodore Blues" Hulse Hey all, First let me say thanks to all the vets out there. Your sacrifice is appreciated. Second I a; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00165.html (8,117 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Camber question (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 10:14:06 -0600; If you mean "tire-shredding understeer" when you say "twitchy" then you're probably right. The steering effort would also be very light, mostly because there's not nearly enough tire touching the pav; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00166.html (9,859 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Camber question (score: 1): Author: "Ross" <ross_hulse@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 10:00:23 -0700; First let me apologize as my post in HTML did not translate to Plain Text. The spec you quote you are trying to meet is the spec for Castor not Camber. The spec for castor is 30 minutes positive plu; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00167.html (8,512 bytes)
5. [Tigers] Camber question (score: 1): Author: "Lynn Wall" <cars@wt-inc.com>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 14:12:53 -0600; Thanks to all that responded. I am going with my current one half degree negative. It seems to work well plus due to the proximity of the upper a-arm to the inner fender well I don t think I could ge; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00171.html (8,072 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] Camber question (score: 1): Author: garywinblad@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 20:14:17 +0000 (UTC); Hi Theo, Lowering the upper fulcrum mount was a trick from the 60's. I was told "we don't do that anymore" back in the 90's.. Do modern tires still like that? My read on it was that the new thinking; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00173.html (9,912 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] Camber question (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 14:31:04 -0600; Hi Gary, I've seen the mod where the upper control arm is drastically tilted to provide a lot of anti-dive... I didn't do that, so I may have created a monster ;) . I'll have to see if the braking is; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00174.html (10,671 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] Camber question (score: 1): Author: "Robin Young" <robin02@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 20:40:51 -0400; The camber gain is good for keeping the tires inside the fenders, anyway. With the stock spindles and 16x7" wheels I had to use spacers to keep the tire rim from hitting the upper ball joint - things; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00177.html (7,819 bytes)
9. Re: [Tigers] Camber question (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:34:03 EDT; Lynn, First let me apologize as my post in HTML did not translate to Plain Text. The spec you quote you are trying to meet is the spec for Castor not Camber. The spec for castor is 30 minutes positiv; /html/tigers/2009-06/msg00103.html (8,430 bytes)
10. Re: [Tigers] Camber question (score: 1): Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:32:13 +1000; the car will have a bit of understeer then will transition to oversteer quite violently mid corner. This would lead to a twitchy feeling in corners.. the tyres will scallop if you are runnign to muc; /html/tigers/2009-06/msg00104.html (7,113 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]