- 1. [Tigers] Cylinder #5 saga.kicking my butt. (score: 1)
- Author: "Duke Samouce" <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:12:18 -0500
- Good morning all, I have had my Tiger since February. I do not know the history of the 260 engine but the PO told me it had been rebuilt .030 over and had very few miles on it since (take that with a
- /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00396.html (9,648 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Tigers] Cylinder #5 saga.kicking my butt. (score: 1)
- Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:59:04 -0400
- As far as I know 289 should be cast into 289 heads; 260 heads were blank. Check for casting numbers and date codes; there is a good chance you have 260 heads C4OE-A which are similar to the 289 head
- /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00397.html (8,014 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Tigers] Cylinder #5 saga.kicking my butt. (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott Hutchinson" <shutchin@netjets.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:01:56 -0400
- The previous owner may have modified the heads. I did it to mine. Scott Hutchinson Director of Operations Netjets Large Aircraft Office 860.292.1191 Mobile 843.290.2805 * ** This message contains inf
- /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00398.html (7,074 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu