Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Emailing\:\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Tigers] Emailing: (score: 1)
Author: Tom Parker <tkparker1941@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:50:45 -0400
It's a Mark 2. The cross member looks o.k. to me, the right stuff is on the driver's wheel well (relay, resistor for the alternator, and it's been TAC'd (or so it seems...) Absent a personal inspecti
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00024.html (9,153 bytes)

2. Re: [Tigers] Emailing: (score: 1)
Author: AAAGLASSS@aol.com
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:56:12 EDT
It's a Mark 2. The cross member looks o.k. to me, the right stuff is on the driver's wheel well (relay, resistor for the alternator, and it's been TAC'd (or so it seems...) Absent a personal inspecti
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00025.html (9,397 bytes)

3. Re: [Tigers] Emailing: (score: 1)
Author: Tom Parker <tkparker1941@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:58:13 -0400
A quick trip to the garage, and a crawl-under to look at the x-member tells me the x-member has been modified. There's a hole missing on the passenger side and the exhaust pass-unders have been boxed
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00026.html (9,248 bytes)

4. Re: [Tigers] Emailing: (score: 1)
Author: Jim Sencindiver <jd.sencindiver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 19:19:12 -0400
I don't see the Mk II specific spare tire tie downs and the battery tie down is wrong. But it has been TACed and the 3 Inspectors saw enough evidence that it was originally manufactured as a Tiger to
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00027.html (8,738 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu