Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Engine\s+ID\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Engine\s+ID\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Engine ID (score: 1): Author: AAAGLASSS@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:22:19 EDT; Is there a way to tell if a small block Ford is a 260, 289 or a 302? B382002560 **Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. (http://www.fanhouse.com/fa; /html/tigers/2008-07/msg00247.html (6,875 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Engine ID (score: 1): Author: AAAGLASSS@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:39:25 EDT; Yes, There is a casting number on the block just above the starter. Remove the starter and it can be easily seen. Then do a google search for Ford engine numbers and you will know. Duke --Original Me; /html/tigers/2008-07/msg00248.html (8,238 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Engine ID (score: 1): Author: <atwittsend@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:29:12 -0500 (CDT); Sometimes you can use clay forced into an area to make a readable impressiom. I'm not sure if it will work here. You might also try a paper impression. Again, if possible, try slipping a piece of pap; /html/tigers/2008-07/msg00252.html (8,051 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Engine ID (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:13:43 -0600; The Tiger-correct 260 and early 289 have five bellhousing attachment bolts, where the Tiger II-correct 289 and all 302's have six. The spacing of these bolts is different between the five and six bol; /html/tigers/2008-07/msg00255.html (7,855 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] Engine ID (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:33:29 -0400; The only way to correctly ID the block is by the part number stamped onto the block near the starter. A 2nd way is to look for the engine build date stamp near the distributor and left head. It will; /html/tigers/2008-07/msg00257.html (8,860 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] Engine ID (score: 1): Author: "Duke Samouce" <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:02:01 -0400; I would seriously question their motives if they will not let you verify the It is only one nut and two bolt for goodness sake. I can R&R my starter in five minutes while on my back. On a lift I bet; /html/tigers/2008-07/msg00268.html (8,981 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] Engine ID (score: 1): Author: "Mike Michels" <mmichels@socal.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:48:35 -0700; It's pretty extreme, but we used a boroscope to find a nearly disappeared date code, which is a pretty good, though not infallible clue. . Also, if I understand correctly, the casting numbers are the; /html/tigers/2008-07/msg00269.html (10,708 bytes)
8. [Tigers] Engine ID (score: 1): Author: "Buck Trippel" <BuckTrippel@Verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:04:01 -0700; With all the recent talk about SBF engine IDs I noticed one of the list consulted Bob Mannel's book on Small Block Ford Engines, which I want to comment on. It's the best book I've run across about o; /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00001.html (6,790 bytes)
9. Re: [Tigers] Engine ID (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:27:47 -0400; I second that and I think it is worth every penny I paid. This book is about 1 1/2" thick and it is jam packed with pictures that cover all aspects of the engine. There is more information in this b; /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00002.html (8,994 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]