Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+F4B\s+or\s+Cast\s+4BL\s+Man\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+F4B\s+or\s+Cast\s+4BL\s+Man\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] F4B or Cast 4BL Man (score: 1): Author: AAAGLASSS@aol.com; Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:40:26 EDT; Is one better than the other in producing power? Other than light weight is the F4B better than cast? Thanks B382002560 **Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on; /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00062.html (7,492 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] F4B or Cast 4BL Man (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:18:20 -0700; Performer. Some claim the Performer is basically just an aluminum version of the standard 4bbl. manifold. Being that there are a number of "factory" manifolds I'm not sure how they make the comparis; /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00063.html (9,603 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] F4B or Cast 4BL Man (score: 1): Author: "William Lau" <mrlau@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:42:41 -0500; I'll bet this could be argued every way that is possible. I don't think there is very much difference and I'm pretty sure it would depend on what other engine modifications were involved anyway. Gene; /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00065.html (7,639 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] F4B or Cast 4BL Man (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 19:54:59 EDT; I'll bet this could be argued every way that is possible. I don't think there is very much difference and I'm pretty sure it would depend on what other engine modifications were involved anyway. I'm; /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00066.html (8,164 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] F4B or Cast 4BL Man (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <lpaulick@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:06:42 -0400; Mike, when I did my 1990 5.0, with 2.25" exhaust, headers and 600 cfm double pumper Holley, I called Edelbrock and asked what manifold would work with my Tiger, and that I did not want to rev over 6K; /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00067.html (9,188 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] F4B or Cast 4BL Man (score: 1): Author: "Kirk Smith" <twotigers@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:22:32 -0700; About 15 years ago I was looking for a manifold for my current Tiger. I liked the performance of the F4B on my previous Tiger and was talking with Edelbrock about the modern day equivalent. Their rec; /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00068.html (7,109 bytes)
7. [Tigers] F4B or Cast 4BL Man (score: 1): Author: "Jeffrey Nichols" <jxnichols@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:48:55 -0400; Here is a link to a comparison on different manifolds for a 302 : http://www.jason.fletcher.net/tech/intakes/intakes.htm Low RPM HP Ford cast iron 141.4 HP @ 2750 rpm Edelbrock low rise performer 136; /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00075.html (8,049 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]