Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Fulcrum\s+Pins\s+\(Tigers\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+3\,\s+Issue\s+49\)\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Tigers] Fulcrum Pins (Tigers Digest, Vol 3, Issue 49) (score: 1)
Author: TIGEROOTES@aol.com
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:49:07 EST
Tom, Brent Edinger and I purchased several sets of fulcrum pins from Derek and they were completely unacceptable. None of them were the same length as eachother, the slots on the sides were randomly
/html/tigers/2009-02/msg00116.html (7,849 bytes)

2. Re: [Tigers] Fulcrum Pins (Tigers Digest, Vol 3, Issue 49) (score: 1)
Author: Tony McNulty <bamcnulty@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:00:48 -0500
I'm looking into monel as a possible material -- I recall that the USCG used that for prop shafts on the 40" utility boats with twin Jimmy 6-71's. Rarely broke under the worst kinds of conditions ima
/html/tigers/2009-02/msg00119.html (9,408 bytes)

3. Re: [Tigers] Fulcrum Pins (Tigers Digest, Vol 3, Issue 49) (score: 1)
Author: THEO SMIT <tsmit@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:31:28 -0700
In "Engineer to Win" Carroll Smith tells about the time that someone decided to make Can-Am rear halfshafts out of maraging steel. This is a superalloy of sorts with a very high yield stress and is u
/html/tigers/2009-02/msg00124.html (11,433 bytes)

4. Re: [Tigers] Fulcrum Pins (Tigers Digest, Vol 3, Issue 49) (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Hutchinson" <shutchin@netjets.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:20:43 -0500
How 'bout Inconel. It is what they went to when the wing bolts of the King 200s were starting to snap from turbulence. Truth be told fixing the ackerman problem would probably solve 99% of the pin pr
/html/tigers/2009-02/msg00131.html (8,089 bytes)

5. Re: [Tigers] Fulcrum Pins (Tigers Digest, Vol 3, Issue 49) (score: 1)
Author: Gary Crandall <maliburevue@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:43:19 -0800 (PST)
I agree. According to DrMayf 's analysis, Dale's ackerman angle kit only makes a 2 degree imporovement, while another 7 degrees is needed. http://www.mayfco.com/steering.htm How 'bout Inconel. It is
/html/tigers/2009-02/msg00132.html (8,806 bytes)

6. Re: [Tigers] Fulcrum Pins (Tigers Digest, Vol 3, Issue 49) (score: 1)
Author: Larry Paulick <lpaulick@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:14:50 -0500
In measurements on my car, On the Tiger, the turning radius were reversed, i.e. the inside wheel had a larger turning radius (26 degrees & 5 minutes), that the outside wheel (30 degrees & 15 minutes)
/html/tigers/2009-02/msg00142.html (9,948 bytes)

7. Re: [Tigers] Fulcrum Pins (Tigers Digest, Vol 3, Issue 49) (score: 1)
Author: PhastPhill@aol.com
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:29:13 EST
I could be wrong ,but as a retired professional tech and one with several friends still in the business, the first comment we all have one looking at the tiger front end is WTF. the ackerman angle is
/html/tigers/2009-02/msg00144.html (8,037 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu