- 1. Re: [Tigers] How hot is hot (further discussion) (score: 1)
- Author: <awtiger@cox.net>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:09:25 -0400
- We've had the "Water Wetter" discussion on this forum before and, once again, I'll register my opinion. First of all, I respect Robert's opinion and experiences, but I must say that mine differ. I ha
- /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00537.html (8,528 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Tigers] How hot is hot (further discussion) (score: 1)
- Author: "William Lau" <mrlau@charter.net>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:14:09 -0500
- Andy, I think you have a real good point. Just because a 180 degree thermostat is in the system doesn't mean that the temperature is 180 at any given point. It just means that the stat opens at that
- /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00544.html (9,892 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Tigers] How hot is hot (further discussion) (score: 1)
- Author: Cullen McCann <cmccann@lwpb.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:42:56 -0500
- I don't remember if I offered my opinion in the water-wetter discussion last time or not, but I agree with Andy, I have used it on another car that was having cooling problems, or at least would cree
- /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00546.html (8,132 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Tigers] How hot is hot (further discussion) (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry" <JCMC2006@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:03:36 -0500
- I would concur completely about the water wetter stuff, I had no effect what so ever when I tried it. I too am convinced that the answer is more air passing the radiator by any and all means possibl
- /html/tigers/2008-08/msg00555.html (10,365 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu