- 1. [Tigers] Low Mileage Tiger - 26,961 miles (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeffrey Nichols" <jxnichols@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:34:25 -0400
- Take a gander at this low mileage Tiger - 26,961 miles - on Ebay. # 370504101887. I like the red line tires with the "pie" mags. It looks good with the carnival red paint. The side view photos show t
- /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00204.html (7,507 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Tigers] Low Mileage Tiger - 26,961 miles (score: 1)
- Author: CoolVT@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:01:00 -0400 (EDT)
- You're sure to open a can of worms on this one;-) I guess the discussion would have to open with defining "survivor". With all the parts that have been replaced and a former paint job, many will not
- /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00205.html (8,784 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Tigers] Low Mileage Tiger - 26,961 miles (score: 1)
- Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:59:20 -0700
- Hmmm, are those original vin tag rivets? Mine do not look like them and our numbers are only a couple hundred different. Nice looking car though, mayf _______________________________________________
- /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00206.html (8,412 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Tigers] Low Mileage Tiger - 26,961 miles (score: 1)
- Author: "Samouce's" <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:55:19 -0500
- Not original rivets. Exhaust is an abomination that I would not allow even on a AMC Pacer. Duke B382002037 Hmmm, are those original vin tag rivets? Mine do not look like them and our numbers are only
- /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00207.html (9,386 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Tigers] Low Mileage Tiger - 26,961 miles (score: 1)
- Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:06:17 -0400
- I agree it is a very nice looking Tiger and it is listed in TBON. As for the rivet - NO; even the vin plate is a repop; polished vin tag, numbers hammered into the metal. This is still a good lookin
- /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00208.html (9,648 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Tigers] Low Mileage Tiger - 26,961 miles (score: 1)
- Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:06:03 -0700
- Oh, now y o u have done it! The Pacer crowd will be camped on your doorstep before dark, lol...... I agree that the exhaust didn't look good though. When you make you dyno runs, please scan and shoot
- /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00211.html (10,532 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Tigers] Low Mileage Tiger - 26,961 miles (score: 1)
- Author: "Samouce's" <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:12:35 -0500
- I see your Pacer and raise you a Gremlin.............don't make me get the Here is a pic for you guys.... http://i796.photobucket.com/albums/yy249/samouce/Tigers%20Teeth/004-6.jpg Larry....you really
- /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00213.html (11,151 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Tigers] Low Mileage Tiger - 26,961 miles (score: 1)
- Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:48:28 +1000
- I posted about this car on the CAT forum the other day. Its interesting as it came up for sale on craiglist late last year for 1/2 the asking price and vanished fast.. so there is something gogin on
- /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00214.html (8,099 bytes)
- 9. Re: [Tigers] Low Mileage Tiger - 26,961 miles (score: 1)
- Author: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 18:23:40 -0700
- Well, crappy dooly... I just went out and looked. Like to apologize to all about the incorrect tivets remark I made. Turns out that this was my first mistake today. I was remembering the rivets on th
- /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00215.html (8,625 bytes)
- 10. Re: [Tigers] Low Mileage Tiger - 26,961 miles (score: 1)
- Author: "awtiger" <awtiger@cox.net>
- Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:23:17 -0500
- Regarding the red Tiger Mk1 on Ebay, I wondered when this car would surface. Actually, somebody is going to get themselves a very nice Tiger. If I had the money, it would be sitting in my shop right
- /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00217.html (12,712 bytes)
- 11. Re: [Tigers] Low Mileage Tiger - 26,961 miles (score: 1)
- Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:15:53 -0400
- Some of the slant seems to change a little from picture to picture maybe due to the way they moved the car around to get photos. Possibly just the photos themselves. I agree the front looks a bit lo
- /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00218.html (9,592 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu