Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Merlin\s+Engines\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Merlin\s+Engines\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Merlin Engines (score: 1): Author: Marc James Small <marcsmall@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:31:01 -0400; Well, the Rolls-Royce Merlin was never installed in a production P-51. The Mustangs had the Packard version of the Merlin which differed in a number of ways from the RR original. Marc msmall@aya.yale; /html/tigers/2008-04/msg00270.html (7,917 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Merlin Engines (score: 1): Author: "Scott Hutchinson" <shutchin@netjets.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:55:14 -0400; Kinda a semantics issue. I'm sure the Rolls-Royce guys would say that they were built by Packard under licence. I think Ford was building B-24s. Does that mean that they weren't Consolidateds? http:/; /html/tigers/2008-04/msg00271.html (9,130 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Merlin Engines (score: 1): Author: Marc James Small <marcsmall@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:06:20 -0400; These are two completely different issues. Aircraft designed by one manufacturer but built by another -- and both Douglas and North American built B-24's as did Ford -- were subject to direct inspect; /html/tigers/2008-04/msg00272.html (8,668 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Merlin Engines (score: 1): Author: "Scott Hutchinson" <shutchin@netjets.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:11:55 -0400; Ya learn somethin' new everyday. Thanks for the info. * ** This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the a; /html/tigers/2008-04/msg00273.html (7,813 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] Merlin Engines (score: 1): Author: Jeff Howarth <jeff@v8tiger.demon.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:50:39 +0100; You have of course seen the Merlin engined tiger : http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v221/kbd23c/v24prototype.jpg lol Jeff -- Jeff Howarth _______________________________________________ Support Team; /html/tigers/2008-04/msg00274.html (8,944 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] Merlin Engines (score: 1): Author: "Scott Hutchinson" <shutchin@netjets.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:22:05 -0400; It would help with some of the short wheelbase issues as well.. Really this would be perfect for those Salt Flat runs mayf. You could run the boost up to 120 inches or so and really move out. ** ** T; /html/tigers/2008-04/msg00275.html (7,942 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] Merlin Engines (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:31:41 EDT; That may look crazy, but hold your hand over the portion just in front of the front wheel. The balance of the stretch makes one nice looking car (in my opinion). M **Need a new ride? Check out the la; /html/tigers/2008-04/msg00276.html (7,682 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] Merlin Engines (score: 1): Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:00:51 -0700; Well, now that streeetttchhhheddd Tiger would be different on the salt for sure. Wheel base is an issue. When Ibuilt the Apline Race car it of course had an 86 inch OEM wheel base. I had started to b; /html/tigers/2008-04/msg00281.html (10,172 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]