Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Mustan\s+double\s+hump\s+pan\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Mustan\s+double\s+hump\s+pan\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Mustan double hump pan (score: 1): Author: garywinblad@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:52:45 +0000 (UTC); Hi Theo, Are thinking the same thing I am? The Mustang double hump pan would help in designing a new suspension Like Mike's but maybe even better. I am thinking tubular like all the K member designs; /html/tigers/2009-02/msg00141.html (7,555 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Mustan double hump pan (score: 1): Author: "Mike Hokanson" <hokey@oasisol.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:33:27 -0800; I looked at the possibility of using the Fox pan as an opportunity to change to a rear-steer design a few years ago, but the headers immediately take it out of the equation. I will be using the Fox-s; /html/tigers/2009-02/msg00143.html (10,454 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]