Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Pertronix\s+and\s+Solid\-Conductor\s+Ignition\s+Wires\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Pertronix\s+and\s+Solid\-Conductor\s+Ignition\s+Wires\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Pertronix and Solid-Conductor Ignition Wires (score: 1): Author: "Will Seay" <wseay@embarqmail.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:21:41 -0500; I'm planning to run Pertronix ignition in my MK1A. Pertronix installation information tells you not to use their module with solid-conductor ignition wires. I can understand why Pertronix would have; /html/tigers/2008-01/msg00175.html (7,490 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix and Solid-Conductor Ignition Wires (score: 1): Author: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>; Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:33:37 -0700; What is your justification for running solid core wires? There are so many good EMI suppression wires around these days that offer the DC resistance of solid wires with the noise suppression of carbo; /html/tigers/2008-01/msg00176.html (7,063 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix and Solid-Conductor Ignition Wires (score: 1): Author: "Will Seay" <wseay@embarqmail.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:27:58 -0500; No, I'm not planning to make a fuelie out of my Tiger or anything like that. The simple reason for using solids is that I have them. I bought a set of repro solid-conductor wires some years ago, lon; /html/tigers/2008-01/msg00187.html (8,532 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix and Solid-Conductor Ignition Wires (score: 1): Author: Sandy Ganz <sganz@pacbell.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:04:53 -0800 (PST); The main reason is that even with the resistor plugs, the nice solid core wires will act as a very good antenna and emit loads of RFI that could affect the Pertronics from the triggering perspective; /html/tigers/2008-01/msg00188.html (9,833 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]