Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Pertronix\s+selection\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Pertronix selection (score: 1)
Author: Rollright@aol.com
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:53:15 EST
As some of you may remember, my "as made, 260" went south about a month ago. I've gathered the Edelbrock F4B, the Holley 465, pretty much set on the Edelbrock 2122 Cam to warm up the performance a b
/html/tigers/2007-11/msg00092.html (7,184 bytes)

2. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix selection (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry" <JCMC2006@suddenlink.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:10:31 -0600
May I suggest the Crane XR-I electronic conversion kit (JEGS,SUMMIT)'s about $65.00. The great thing about it is it has a built in rev limiter that you can adjust from 4000 to 8000RPM. Good way to s
/html/tigers/2007-11/msg00093.html (8,223 bytes)

3. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix selection (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Hutchinson" <shutchin@netjets.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:49:08 -0500
I have a similar setup and my ignitor II works great with the original tach. Scott Hutchinson Assistant Director of Operations Netjets International Office 860.292.1191 Mobile 843.290.2805 ** This me
/html/tigers/2007-11/msg00094.html (6,855 bytes)

4. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix selection (score: 1)
Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:35:57 -0800
I have a similar set-up on my Tiger, with the Ignitor I installed, and the Ignitor II on my shelf. The P-I works really fine. The P-II has a much higher voltage output, which can challenge your igni
/html/tigers/2007-11/msg00095.html (9,363 bytes)

5. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix selection (score: 1)
Author: "Tigerman" <Tigerman67@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:09:45 -0700
I installed a Pertronix II and pertronix Flamethrower II coil (stock looking) on both my Mustang and my Tiger. On the mustang, I also installed the pertronix wires (black, stock looking), but haven't
/html/tigers/2007-11/msg00096.html (10,421 bytes)

6. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix selection (score: 1)
Author: CoolVT@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:13:19 EST
I think someone mentioned that with the Ignitor ll that if the ignition key was mistankenly left on that it wouldn't burn out the ignitor. Someone said that it would in the #1 so I opted for the ll.
/html/tigers/2007-11/msg00097.html (7,827 bytes)

7. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix selection (score: 1)
Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:28:30 -0700
That feature is probably the single most useful improvement ever added to any of the aftermarket points-replacement systems, and it's why I recommend using the Pertronix Ignitor II over the P-I or ot
/html/tigers/2007-11/msg00098.html (9,548 bytes)

8. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix selection (score: 1)
Author: "Rense, Mark (GE Indust, ConsInd)" <mark.rense@ge.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:18:45 -0500
I run stock points in the stock motor on B382001465 and a Pertronix Ignitor I unit and coil on the 289 in B382000991, no ballast resistor. The 991 car has a dual-point (mechanical advance only) dist
/html/tigers/2007-11/msg00119.html (9,509 bytes)

9. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix selection (score: 1)
Author: "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 08:26:29 -0700
If it fits without modifications or custom machine work, then it doesn't belong on a Tiger... Just bolting stuff on is way too easy. ;) Theo --Original Message-- From: tigers-bounces+theo.smit=dynast
/html/tigers/2007-11/msg00120.html (8,313 bytes)

10. Re: [Tigers] Pertronix selection (score: 1)
Author: "Rense, Mark (GE Indust, ConsInd)" <mark.rense@ge.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:42:11 -0500
Truer words were never spoken! Would be nice to get a mulligan once in a while though! --Original Message-- From: tigers-bounces+mark.rense=ge.com@autox.team.net [mailto:tigers-bounces+mark.rense=ge.
/html/tigers/2007-11/msg00123.html (8,918 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu