Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Risky\s+Business\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: Jeffrey Nichols <jxnichols@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
A newbie to this list may wonder what type of nut drives a Sunbeam Tiger, First we had discussion on "exploding ball joints" a while back , then it was brought up that these cars have suspension fulc
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00206.html (7,770 bytes)

2. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:21:11 -0700
You forgot to mention rivets (and screws) that make for removable I.D.. Why you can have the fraud squad haul your Tiger off in the middle of the night straight into the jaws of a crusher!!! And that
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00209.html (8,337 bytes)

3. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: MAURO D'ANGELO <m_dangelo@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:22:31 -0400
As a matter of fact, I am one of those people, and I do not fully trust my car yet because of all of this talk. I really love my Tiger, but I feel so much more comfortable (and safe) in my Porsche be
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00210.html (9,235 bytes)

4. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Young" <ron.young@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:26:17 -0700
So, Jeff, does this mean that you want to sell yours cheap?!?! Ron Dana Point, CA "Lurker" that has always wanted a Tiger since they were new. -- Original Message -- From: "Jeffrey Nichols" <jxnichol
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00211.html (8,848 bytes)

5. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: "Stu Brennan" <stubrennan@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:35:29 -0400
Be safe, Buy a Toyota. Stu A newbie to this list may wonder what type of nut drives a Sunbeam Tiger, First we had discussion on "exploding ball joints" a while back , then it was brought up that thes
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00212.html (8,505 bytes)

6. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:09:47 +1000
Not sure what year porsche you have but they were know as the "widow makers" especially the early 930 (911 turbo) .. though as with all cars.. genrally accidents happen due to the drivers skill base/
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00213.html (7,799 bytes)

7. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: "Robin Young" <Robin02@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:04:01 -0400
Newbies get a lot of good advice here.....I was a newbie once ten years ago and over the years have appreciated my scatter shield, added the Logan/Johnson fulcrum pin fix, Dales Ackerman fix, did the
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00214.html (8,929 bytes)

8. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:17:45 -0600
Mauro, you shouldn't be leery of driving your car, so long as you know everything is up to date as far as maintenance is concerned. But a Tiger is a 60's car, and it was not designed to last forever.
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00216.html (10,123 bytes)

9. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: spook01@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:17:48 +0000 (UTC)
hmmmmmmmm well, i have raced the tigger on the track, auto crossed it, used it as a daily driver, and run it at the drags, then hauled ass down the freeway on 650 mile trips. no fan blade decapatatio
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00218.html (10,899 bytes)

10. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: MAURO D'ANGELO <m_dangelo@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 06:12:57 -0400
Right. As I said, if something were to happen in one of my 911s, it would be because of human error, not mechanical failure. My point was simply that all the talk of the extreme lack of confidence in
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00220.html (9,524 bytes)

11. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: arado7@sbcglobal.net
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 04:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
If the Tiger had no allusion of danger it would not be as much fun. gary A newbie to this list may wonder what type of nut drives a Sunbeam Tiger, First we had discussion on "exploding ball joints" a
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00221.html (9,231 bytes)

12. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Hutchinson" <shutchin@netjets.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:39:14 -0400
I think the biggest risk you run in the Tiger is that of someone else hitting Goes for just about any car of the tigers size made in the sixties. In terms of safety equipment not much has changed sin
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00222.html (8,468 bytes)

13. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: m_dangelo@verizon.net
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:21:39 -0500 (CDT)
Believe me, I am all about adrenaline rushes and taking lots of calculated risks. I love to seek the edge of physics, to get to it without crossing the limit. That's exactly what I thrive on the mos
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00223.html (12,179 bytes)

14. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: Tom Hall <modtiger@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:00:00 -0700
Let me get this straight, You think it's advisable, to advance the reputation of the marque, that those of us with historic understanding of certain design limitations and or possible shortcomings, s
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00233.html (10,484 bytes)

15. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: Gary <maliburevue@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
Once again, more car than the average driver can handle. It only takes money to buy one, not driving skills. Right. As I said, if something were to happen in one of my 911s, it would be because of hu
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00238.html (10,459 bytes)

16. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: Steve Laifman <slaifman@socal.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:51:56 -0700
Be very, very, thankful to those with the technical expertise and experience, like Tom Hall, Dan Walters, Theo Smit, and many, many others for sharing their knowledge and experience with us. OR Wish
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00239.html (11,149 bytes)

17. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: "Rense, Mark (GE Indust, ConsInd)" <mark.rense@ge.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:30:00 -0400
It's all about perspective. I used to hold an AMA National Number and raced 250GP and Superbikes in the early '80's. To me my stroker-engined Tigers are relatively safe! Bugz ________________________
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00244.html (8,402 bytes)

18. [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: "John Dillman" <John.Dillman@PUBLICANS.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:39:40 -0500
I think that Laifman guy has some good points from time to time, too ;) John Dillman To: Tom Hall <modtiger@comcast.net> Cc: tigers@autox.team.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00251.html (8,874 bytes)

19. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: Steve Ralsten <s_ralsten@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Agent 99... But Max if you drive that Tiger in every show the flywheel could explode or the fulcrum pins could break. The gas tank might explode or even the u joint could break. You'll be alone and i
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00252.html (8,274 bytes)

20. Re: [Tigers] Risky Business (score: 1)
Author: MAURO D'ANGELO <m_dangelo@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:23:18 -0400
First of all, I would like for you to know that I was not singling you out at all. I also was not saying that those with experience should not let people know where the car's shortcomings are. I use
/html/tigers/2010-04/msg00256.html (11,915 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu