Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Speaking\s+of\s+Panhard\s+Bars\.\.\.\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Speaking of Panhard Bars... (score: 1)
Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:09:06 -0700
Are there any other cars that use leaf springs like our cars and a panhard bar? The use of a panhard bar in our case is just counter intuitive to me. The leaf springs keep the rear end located and th
/html/tigers/2008-07/msg00037.html (7,544 bytes)

2. Re: [Tigers] Speaking of Panhard Bars... (score: 1)
Author: "Duke Samouce" <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 15:34:45 -0400
My car is running without traction bars or a panhard rod. Both of those devices seem to be fixes for the soft OEM springs. I have Dale's rear springs installed and they are great. I have no issues do
/html/tigers/2008-07/msg00039.html (8,719 bytes)

3. Re: [Tigers] Speaking of Panhard Bars... (score: 1)
Author: "Owain Lloyd" <owain.lloyd@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 21:50:47 +0100
i no longer get any wheel hop either. i also run very wide tires that would certainly foul something if they moved much and they do not. i have a beefy 302, mod tiger springs, koni anti-tramp shocks
/html/tigers/2008-07/msg00040.html (9,591 bytes)

4. Re: [Tigers] Speaking of Panhard Bars... (score: 1)
Author: Marc James Small <marcsmall@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:54:56 -0400
The much more civilized Alpine did not need a Panhard Rod to produce manueverability which, all else being equal, routinely leaves Tigers in the dust on any sort of decent back road. The original Tig
/html/tigers/2008-07/msg00041.html (9,456 bytes)

5. Re: [Tigers] Speaking of Panhard Bars... (score: 1)
Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:33:06 -0700
What's baseball? And I certainly agreee with you on the steering part of an Alpine! While it looks odd, it at least works! Heck, maybe we can get a challenge race going, eh? Something like the gumbal
/html/tigers/2008-07/msg00043.html (10,122 bytes)

6. Re: [Tigers] Speaking of Panhard Bars... (score: 1)
Author: Tony Somebody <achd73@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 17:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
Tigers must not ned panhard rods. Why else do they continue to self destruct by ripping the welds and or frame from itself? TtT _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http:/
/html/tigers/2008-07/msg00045.html (10,951 bytes)

7. Re: [Tigers] Speaking of Panhard Bars... (score: 1)
Author: "Will Seay" <wseay@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 09:45:32 -0400
I think the idea behind the Panhard rod is to keep the rear end and axle from rotating on torque reaction. When lots of torque is transmitted to the rear end, it tends to rotate (in the axis along t
/html/tigers/2008-07/msg00051.html (9,898 bytes)

8. Re: [Tigers] Speaking of Panhard Bars... (score: 1)
Author: PhastPhill@aol.com
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 10:08:21 EDT
They pull out of the MKIIs as well. Mine is long gone. _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Tigers@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mai
/html/tigers/2008-07/msg00052.html (7,398 bytes)

9. [Tigers] Speaking of Panhard Bars... (score: 1)
Author: "William Lau" <mrlau@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 11:41:54 -0500
My MKII never got the message either. It pulled loose but it was auto crossed extensively and that is where it gets the most abuse on the panhard rod. Early Mustangs didn't have panhard rods or tract
/html/tigers/2008-07/msg00053.html (7,990 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu