Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Temp\s+Gauge\s+Accuracy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Temp\s+Gauge\s+Accuracy\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Temp Gauge Accuracy (score: 1): Author: "James Lindner" <jliny5@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:00:00 -0400; Hi All, My Mk1 is back in the garage after a long winter's rest and some work to address body panel issues. One of the things I wanted to do after reading a thread from a few months back, was to chec; /html/tigers/2011-03/msg00249.html (7,677 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Temp Gauge Accuracy (score: 1): Author: "Stu Brennan" <stubrennan@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:34:42 -0400; For info on gage troubleshooting, check out my article at: http://www.tigersunited.com/techtips/BrennanGauge/rt-BrennanGauge1.asp There's a explanation of how things work, and how to troubleshoot. Wh; /html/tigers/2011-03/msg00250.html (7,557 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Temp Gauge Accuracy (score: 1): Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:02:41 +1100; it also depends on what sender you are using, and where it is mounted. From what i understand the autometer senders that people often use mounted on the manifold do not read well with the original ga; /html/tigers/2011-03/msg00251.html (8,887 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Temp Gauge Accuracy (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 20:11:06 -0400; I think you can find all that information on Tigersunited.com under Tech Tips. The first thing I would do is make sure all the green wires from the instrument voltage regulator to the gages are in g; /html/tigers/2011-03/msg00252.html (9,440 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] Temp Gauge Accuracy (score: 1): Author: allfudge1635@gmail.com; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:19:06 +0000; The first thing I would do is verify the accuracy of your temperature reading. If you used a laser thermometer you should place black electrical tape on the surface you are measuring, then,if your m; /html/tigers/2011-03/msg00253.html (9,012 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] Temp Gauge Accuracy (score: 1): Author: "James Lindner" <jliny5@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:34:20 -0400; I tested my sender and compared the reading against Stu Brennan's chart on TU. Sure enough my reading showed way too much resistance, My reading...118 ohms @ 178 degrees Chart shows...77 ohms @ 176 d; /html/tigers/2011-03/msg00278.html (8,745 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] Temp Gauge Accuracy (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:59:52 -0400; This is a post from several years ago from Tom Prager maybe it will help. On Behalf Of Thomas Prager I tested my sender and compared the reading against Stu Brennan's chart on TU. Sure enough my rea; /html/tigers/2011-03/msg00280.html (9,375 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] Temp Gauge Accuracy (score: 1): Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:25:11 +1100; I was under the impression that the autometer temp senders did not read accurately with the stock gauge.. at least when in the manifold. I have the autometer in my and with a newly installed nOS gaug; /html/tigers/2011-03/msg00281.html (8,550 bytes)
9. Re: [Tigers] Temp Gauge Accuracy (score: 1): Author: "Wally Menke" <walmenke@bigpond.net.au>; Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:48:13 +1000; I can conclusively say that the Autometer sensor does not work accurately with the standard gauge. From memory it reads way too high. Wally Menke Jim This is a post from several years ago from Tom Pr; /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00037.html (8,251 bytes)
10. Re: [Tigers] Temp Gauge Accuracy (score: 1): Author: Gary Winblad <garywinblad@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:56:55 +0000 (UTC); I beg to differ. Perhaps you bought the wrong Autometer sender, they do have several types. Any given sender and any given gauge will be slightly different but the Autometer sender is as close as any; /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00039.html (7,494 bytes)
11. Re: [Tigers] Temp Gauge Accuracy (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 09:25:24 -0400 (EDT); My experience too was that it seemed to give a reading that was very similar to the stock sender. Mark In a message dated 4/4/2011 9:18:21 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, garywinblad@comcast.net writes:; /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00040.html (7,673 bytes)
12. Re: [Tigers] Temp Gauge Accuracy (score: 1): Author: Gary Winblad <garywinblad@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 23:20:06 +0000 (UTC); Hi Michael, I use Autometer sender #2254 http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ATM-2254/ Gary Gary, What part number sender are you using? On 04/04/2011, Gary Winblad wrote: -- Regards Michael King _____; /html/tigers/2011-04/msg00046.html (8,828 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]