- 1. [Tigers] Thunderbird 302s (score: 1)
- Author: "A. C. Tynes" <v8tracker@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:20:20 -0500
- I saw a mention on the Internet that the installed length of 302s in the pre-94 Thunderbirds were as much as 2 inches shorter than in Mustangs. Supposedly due to different front covers and possibly d
- /html/tigers/2008-09/msg00463.html (7,029 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Tigers] Thunderbird 302s (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Waite <fordlandia@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
- An excerpt from this web page: http://www.mre-books.com/ranger/cooling.html "If you need a few more inches of room at the front of your motor a possibility worth considering is one of the short water
- /html/tigers/2008-09/msg00464.html (8,771 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Tigers] Thunderbird 302s (score: 1)
- Author: Tony Somebody <achd73@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
- If one moved his water pump back 1.5" that would make more room but now how do I bring the crank pulley in alignment with the pump pulley. Thinking the pump is further back I would then have to move
- /html/tigers/2008-09/msg00465.html (8,945 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Tigers] Thunderbird 302s (score: 1)
- Author: "A. C. Tynes" <v8tracker@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:53:23 -0500
- Thanks, Bill. That was the exact info I was looking for. It looks like the simplest solution is to find the right donor car in the first place. A.C. Tynes ____________________________________________
- /html/tigers/2008-09/msg00466.html (10,271 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Tigers] Thunderbird 302s (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Munroe <dave@munroe.ca>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:27:46 -0300
- Wow Bill; Great info......thanks! I have my cooling issues resolved, but only about 1/2 inch clearance between the rad and my stock water pump shaft. My fan is also buried deep into the shroud. This
- /html/tigers/2008-09/msg00467.html (7,940 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu