Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Tigers\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+5\,\s+Issue\s+31\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Tigers\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+5\,\s+Issue\s+31\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 5, Issue 31 (score: 1): Author: Mike Baskette <mikebaskette@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:10:45 -0800 (PST); I'm am no expert on the block issue, come to think of it, I'm no expert. If you check MustangTek you will see that the 289 block was started in 1963 (C3OE-6015-B), 4.0 bore. I have one stashed in the; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00209.html (7,508 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 5, Issue 31 (score: 1): Author: Tom Parker <tkparker1941@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:54:37 -0500; Mine's a '67 Mark 2 with the 6 bolt block and "289" in the valley. The casting code (block, drivers side front): 6D27 L (I think it's an "L"). The car s/n is 105, which makes it the 6th production Ma; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00211.html (8,636 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 5, Issue 31 (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:08:56 -0500; This is where you need to recheck your information. MustangTek is a good site but they list C3OE-6015-B as both a 260 and 289 block which can not be. There are errors on that site. A better referenc; /html/tigers/2011-01/msg00218.html (9,292 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]