Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Tigers\s+and\s+Jeep\s+parts\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Tigers\s+and\s+Jeep\s+parts\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Tigers and Jeep parts? (score: 1): Author: Cullen McCann <cmccann@lwpb.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:49:31 -0500; I recall in past conversations that certain jeeps, maybe postal jeeps (?), often provide some unique components for some Tiger projects, could someone please refresh my memory as to what this connec; /html/tigers/2008-10/msg00299.html (7,126 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Tigers and Jeep parts? (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:59:02 -0400; I think the only connection is the Dana 44 differential. Ron Fraser Friends, I recall in past conversations that certain jeeps, maybe postal jeeps (?), often provide some unique components for some; /html/tigers/2008-10/msg00300.html (7,763 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Tigers and Jeep parts? (score: 1): Author: Cullen McCann <cmccann@lwpb.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:01:52 -0500; Thanks Ron, is there any cause to think that postal jeeps are frequently/always positraction? Is the track width of the dana supposed to be the same so it could be directly installed? Cullen I think; /html/tigers/2008-10/msg00301.html (7,526 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Tigers and Jeep parts? (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:16:53 -0400; I have no idea and no experience with the postal Jeeps. Ron Thanks Ron, is there any cause to think that postal jeeps are frequently/always positraction? Is the track width of the dana supposed to b; /html/tigers/2008-10/msg00302.html (8,827 bytes)
5. Re: [Tigers] Tigers and Jeep parts? (score: 1): Author: Cullen McCann <cmccann@lwpb.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:20:07 -0500; Thanks Ron, I understand. is it convenient for anyone to give me a dimension of the Tiger Dana, from some measurable point, like flange to flange or back of backing plate? The original rear end for m; /html/tigers/2008-10/msg00303.html (9,053 bytes)
6. Re: [Tigers] Tigers and Jeep parts? (score: 1): Author: Chris Richards <cjrichardsauto@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:50:32 -0700 (PDT); I have a postal jeep rear diff here. Axle flange to flange it is about 3/4 inch narrower than the Tiger Rear Diff. Also, it has larger diameter brakes and Ford Truck wheel pattern. Regards-Chris Than; /html/tigers/2008-10/msg00304.html (8,113 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] Tigers and Jeep parts? (score: 1): Author: Cullen McCann <cmccann@lwpb.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:56:11 -0500; Thanks Chris! thats interesting....sounds like it might even give you a little more room for tire? ( not that we can get much under there, but maybe the difference in offset would help?) Chris - so i; /html/tigers/2008-10/msg00305.html (8,520 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] Tigers and Jeep parts? (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:49:08 -0700; I am not sure that the previous communications on your interest in Postal Jeeps was completely addressed. I do NOT think any of the responses, or measurements, dealt with the whole rear axle, but on; /html/tigers/2008-10/msg00307.html (9,653 bytes)
9. Re: [Tigers] Tigers and Jeep parts? (score: 1): Author: Cullen McCann <cmccann@lwpb.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:03:37 -0500; Thanks Steve, I will consider the information carefully. I have had some of the "regulars" contact me off-list and a couple were under the impression that there was also a spline difference in the je; /html/tigers/2008-10/msg00308.html (11,012 bytes)
10. Re: [Tigers] Tigers and Jeep parts? (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:09:10 EDT; I seem to remember that the only issue preventing direct swaps was the Jeep use coarse spline axles while the Tiger use fine spine. Dave Thanks Chris! thats interesting....sounds like it might even g; /html/tigers/2008-10/msg00311.html (9,666 bytes)
11. Re: [Tigers] Tigers and Jeep parts? (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:47:56 -0700; Hi Cullen, I recall looking at the postal Jeep rearends a number of years ago. My Tiger had water in the rearend, shot bearings and a rather sad set of gears. My recollection was: The postal Jeep rea; /html/tigers/2008-10/msg00312.html (9,144 bytes)
12. Re: [Tigers] Tigers and Jeep parts? (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:14:34 -0700; I found this a while ago. Thought it might be of some help as it list many rear end sizes. http://hot-rod.com.au/builder/techrear-trackwidth.html Tom [demime found a multipart/alternative section wh; /html/tigers/2008-10/msg00313.html (8,393 bytes)
13. Re: [Tigers] Tigers and Jeep parts? (score: 1): Author: Cullen McCann <cmccann@lwpb.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:17:07 -0500; Thanks everyone for the info on the postal jeep rear ends...Ive gotten lots of good info, both on list and off list...I think I have enough info to at least make an educated decision. There are defin; /html/tigers/2008-10/msg00321.html (8,590 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]